This is fantastic but I'm confused as to how they ID'd Wanda? The article said they ID'd the killer from his DNA at a Texas crime scene but then how did they link that to Wanda if she'd never been reported missing?
Yes I see that's how they know he killed her but how does that lead to her being ID'd? If she hadn't been reported missing? Did they use genetic genealogy? I just haven't seen that link be spelled out anywhere of how they ID'd her.According to Hornell native identified as victim of 'Valentine Jane Doe Homicide', his DNA was found at her crime scene.
Yes I see that's how they know he killed her but how does that lead to her being ID'd? If she hadn't been reported missing? Did they use genetic genealogy? I just haven't seen that link be spelled out anywhere of how they ID'd her.
Hornell native identified as victim of 'Valentine Jane Doe Homicide'Sheriff’s Office Major Crimes Unit Detective Vince Weiner and the FDLE partnered using new advanced DNA technology, which assisted in identifying the victim as well as the suspect.
Sorry, I misread your question. You're right, they don't say. That's odd.
I'm not an ancestry member but google tells me that there is a family tree on there with Wanda in it so I'm thinking you're right.The way it was worded on how they ID'd both the killer and the victim, I'm extrapolating it was genetic genealogy for both.
BBM
'
I just saw Carl possess on FB that she has been identified along with her killer. I have been following her case for a long time, glad she finally has her name back. I am wondering too how they made the comparison since she wasn’t reported missing.
Wow so happy she got identifiedi'm always exited when Doe's get the names back and especially those older ones.
Sad that no one reported her missing and her parents are no longer alive but at least we knowseems like her killer was killed not to long after her murder...good riddance i guess.
Rest Easy Wanda.
I love the identified cases that make me "whaaaa???" out loud in joy! I remember the first time I stumbled upon this case in 2007!
As to why Wanda wasn't reported missing, she could have been 18 already and left voluntarily. Her family could have dealt with the same thing Jason Callahan's (AKA Grateful doe) family did.
I think it should be widely publicized that if you have a family member that you haven't seen in a while to check in on them. It should be on commericals and billboards IMO.
This is fantastic but I'm confused as to how they ID'd Wanda?
I love the identified cases that make me "whaaaa???" out loud in joy! I remember the first time I stumbled upon this case in 2007!
As to why Wanda wasn't reported missing, she could have been 18 already and left voluntarily. Her family could have dealt with the same thing Jason Callahan's (AKA Grateful doe) family did.
I think it should be widely publicized that if you have a family member that you haven't seen in a while to check in on them. It should be on commericals and billboards IMO.
The article above says new DNA techniques were used to ID her - presumably familial DNA?