Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[/QUOTE]Yep, I just now found the video with that. I guess the papers edited it. Imo I think it's much more effective with all of it.
Link for afternoon video about 15-20 min. From end of video.
http://new.livestream.com/tampabaytimes/events/2979805/videos/50248171
In court Wednesday, the jury listened to a taped police interview with Julie Schenecker just hours after the murders of her children. Later in the day, Schenecker became emotional and started crying when the judge directly questioned her about a stipulation in the case.
Schenecker had a half-dozen half-formed replies. She'd loved her children until they reached the age of 6, she told the detectives. But in the last few years, her 16-year-old daughter, Calyx, had become "mouthy" and her 13-year-old son was following suit. "They were really mean," she said, recalling how Calyx threatened to go away to college and never see her mother again. The remark had made her cry, Schenecker said.
She only had good things to say about PS and didn't trash him like some wives would do. I think the only negative comment was when she was in bed 7 weeks and he didn't care.
I couldn't find video yet, but when I do I'll post it, til I do here is the text regarding the stipulation from the judge and JS.
http://www.baynews9.com/content/new...ticles/bn9/2014/5/7/testimony_to_resume_.html
From above link:
At the end of the court session today, Judge Emmett L. Battles asked Schenecker directly if she understood and agreed to the stipulation that her children, Beau and Calyx Schenecker died on Jan. 27, 2011.
Julie Schenecker initially said "I've been advised to answer yes."
Battles again asked her if she understood and she became emotional. Battles then asked her defense attorneys to take more time and counsel with their client.
After a short break, he asked again and she responded "Yes, Your Honor."
Link for afternoon video about 15-20 min. From end of video.
http://new.livestream.com/tampabaytimes/events/2979805/videos/50248171
While I think Julie needs to be found guilty for these murders...I can't just give Parker a pass. It seems help was offered from her family and not exactly welcome...his email seems to be a real trigger for Julie as it was written just days before the murder and he says""For those who have expressed your criticism about how I'm handling the current crisis or how I parent my children I'll write off your criticism as ignorance, . I just can't get by his leaving the kids in the house with her. I know the defense is going to ask him about the days leading up to it and I guess he can say just about anything because everyone that knew about that time are dead.
Maybe he liked to keep her doped up on her meds so he could control her. I think there was a lot more dysfunction going on in this family then we will ever know. Who knows maybe he was like living with a drill sergeant, abusive. Always two sides to the story.
I understand what you are saying, but I am going to withhold judgement of him because nobody truly knew what was going on inside that house other than the 4 people who lived there. If you look at the emails that have been released, you can see where PS was trying to communicate with JS doctors and was getting the kids and the family into counseling. IMO, I don't expect people to understand what it is like to be a homicide survivor unless they are one. Same here. After all, PS served our country with seeming professionalism and grace and we owe him the benefit of the doubt on this one. JMV
I can't bash PS because I live in a glass house. It would be unfair of me to even speculate what he has gone through. JMV
Yeah...did he really say that?
As far as the drinking -- in his email to the doctor (Nov 2010, I think) Parker said that it was customary for them to have a glass of wine with dinner, several times a week. So...apparently, she had been able to handle a modest amount of wine when she was on Abilify.
Accdg to PS, It was when the doctor took her off of Abilify (due to the Tardive Dyskenesia, I guess) and switched her to Lithium (in Sept.) that things started to go south. Parker said 3 days after starting Lithium, she got drunk at a family gathering, and he noticed she was drinking a lot at home. He didn't believe JS when she said the doc said she could have 2 glasses of wine with the Lithium, but then found a note from the doc that said just that! :facepalm:
Parker sent repeated emails to the doc, saying Julie wasn't doing well, wasn't getting out of bed, was falling a lot, losing her memory...and apparently the doc did nothing.
That doctor has a lot to answer for.
That's was a lot of responsibility for a very sick woman alcohol and drug problems included to cook, run errands and hold down the fort for 10 days especially with your own children bullying you. I don't care if she said "I got it" he knew the problems in that family and what a sick unreliable puppy she was.
She was a train wreck waiting to happen. Didn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out.
Julie never read that email. Parker sent that mail to various family members.
She asked her family to forward it to her, but they all refused.
PS couldn't just take the children away from her. No doctor reported she was dangerous to her children from what we know. PS tried to get information from the doctor but she would not permit the doctor to tell him anything. I do think he was handling it because he had arranged for the daughter to go to a private boarding school. Regardless of whether he removed the children from the home or not unless there was a report he could take to court that said she was a danger to the children she would still be entitled to see them and could have killed them at that time.
To me, it appears she wanted to get back at PS the only way she could because she feared he was going to divorce her and take the kids (they would not have stayed with her by their own choice) so she may have killed them out of spite.
If the judge told her in court he was not playing games with her, he has her number. She does understand what is being said because she reacts. She reacted when PS called her "the defendant". She clearly did not like that coming from him. jmo