((I apologize in advance, because this is a bit more rambling than my typical writing style. I hope that it is at least somewhat possible to follow!))
The latest release from the Democrat has to do with the animosity and tension between TPD and SAO. It appears that TDO did a PRR for emails related to the case/release of the PCA (and/or emails within the period of time surrounding the motion to seal/SG's arrest/PCA being unsealed)... basically, a Lt. at TPD says that it appears that the SAO is not just leaking, but rather gushing, information that has not yet been made public. This is based on information they learned from a local citizen who claims she heard it from the wife of an investigator at SAO. Locally, there has been bit of controversy associated with said investigator in the last year or two, but at the end of the day, the elected state attorney, Willie Meggs, comes to his defense.
Theresa Flury, the attorney for TPD who filed the motion to seal the PCA, is married to Leon County Judge Ron Flury. They are easily two of the most well-respected members of the Tallahassee legal community. Judge Flury is a former assistant state attorney (who served under Meggs), and Theresa was an assistant public defender and later an assistant state attorney (who also served under Meggs), as well, before moving to the private sector. It is worth noting that Jack Campbell, the ASA who, according to TPD, agreed to keep the PCA sealed (apparently unbeknownst to Meggs and his second in command, Georgia), is the son of Larry Campbell, the late Sheriff of Leon County. Jack Campbell is currently running to replace Willie Meggs as the State Attorney for FL's 2nd Jud. Cir., and his father's successor, Mike Wood, is running to retain his inherited seat as the Leon County Sheriff.
As to a previous poster's comment about the burglary gone bad scenario not working out based on falling into a drainage ditch the day before the murder... the apartment complex mentioned (the Ashford Club) is next door to a Suntrust Bank. And by next door, I mean that they share a driveway -- and the shared driveway is what leads to the access to the trail/path that follows the ditch area behind Trescott Drive, which is located at the rear of the two properties. It is unlikely that the apartment complex has cameras covering that area, but it is possible that the bank does have cameras that at least capture the access to that area, if not the trailhead itself. It's certainly possible that they planned on a burglary gone wrong scenario, but it's also possible they were hoping to avoid detection by neighbors (and there are many people in that neighborhood who are home during the day -- from retired residents to stay at home moms) and realized that the apartment complex/bank surveillance was more of a risk than the handful of residents who might be home during the day on Trescott Drive.
Again, apologies for the rambling, but hopefully this helps provide some insight to others.