I respectfully disagree with Ms. Cappleman. While testimony from Magbanua would make the case much easier to win, it is certainly not necessary to go forward with a case against Charlie and Donna. I believe LE and the prosecutors have been doing a great job. But these definitive statements to the press that there is no case against the Adelsons are ill-advised in my opinion. What if KM doesn't roll and you have to go forward against Donna or Charlie (or both) without her testimony? Now you have a public admission that your evidence stinks when in reality it doesn't. Also, if you are negotiating with KM for her testimony, why let her think that she holds all the cards and that you can't go after the Adelsons without her?