reallybusy
random person
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2016
- Messages
- 312
- Reaction score
- 838
Key information that we have now from the two recent court proceedings.
Clarification on the case
Info on KM and CA:
LRs testimony inconsistencies:
My insights on the defense counsel-
Last and notable points-
Clarification on the case
- The gun found was not the gun used to kill Markel. The lead investigator said, we are still looking.
- The Prius was found, and the bullet hole from SG was there.
- The payment for KMs breast enhancement was largely consolidated to two large cash payments -- no credit cards from CA.
- The defense pointed out that KM worked at two nightclubs (one named as the Hard Rock) and this could explain all the cash deposits.
- The subpoena from Adelson Institute for employee records returned only records of payment -- no job description, timecards or any evidence of work that she executed.
- Adelson Institute employee questioned has never seen or met KM. However, she had heard of her and was told she worked on weekends. LE claimed she did not go there on weekends. The defense said that it is possible she could have worked from home. However gave no evidence of the fact, such as emails or proof of work.
Info on KM and CA:
- The lead investigator (also the one who interviewed Wendi in that interrogation video) indicated that CA had had many girlfriends since KM. I counted three names listed including his current one.
- KM moved to Miami from the Philippines when she was 7 and has never returned.
- KM has two older brothers. The oldest lives in Miami area is married with two children and is taking care of KMs children now. The middle child ( the brother who took the stand, Erik) lives in Gainesville and indicated she was welcome there if released on bond. The defense pointed out this was a suitable location to be since it is in between Miami and Tallahassee.
- The defense said KM was willing to surrender her passport.
- Erik stated KMs mom has breast cancer and KM had been driving her to treatments. Also, that KMs son suffered from a speech impediment that he was getting treatment for it. This was when a tissue was handed to KM.
- There was no tissue handed to her when a photo of Markels head post shooting was shown-- which was an awful sight.
- KM has a BA in Healthcare Mgmt - defense made this point to make it clear she is qualified to work at the Adelson Institute.
- The defense submitted a court paper in regards to KM bringing a paternity suit against SG. In that doc, her employment is listed as the Adelson Institute.
LRs testimony inconsistencies:
- The defense poked LRs story as inconsistent on many fronts:
- when he first learned that theyd commit murder - whether it was in the car with SG or at LRs house
- the payment the next day - LRs phone doesnt put him at the barber shop like he said
- LRs girlfriend says KM and SG dropped the money off and left before LR returned.
- Phone records show that LR called KM first not the other way around. However the prosecution claimed that KM had an old number for LR and had left word with one of LR friends that she was looking for LR and SG and trying to get in contact.
- The Markel kids (now the Adelson kids) were in daycare the whole day before the murder and therefore could not be in the neighborhood with Wendi.
- SG was not on the phone with KM the way up on the first attempt to murder, however, the prosecution pointed out that they supposedly had burner phones on that trip.
My insights on the defense counsel-
- Throughout the proceedings, they showed almost a gleeful defiance sitting at their table with KM in response to everything the prosecution was doing/saying. They'd constantly whisper to KM and each other over KM. Theyd shake their heads (the women was more animated than the male counsel) as if to reassure KM and themselves that it much of what was being said was baloney. I found it very distracting and took it was they were constantly reassuring KM of the strength of her case.
- The defense was constantly objecting. Constantly.
- The woman lawyer was wobbly in her 4+ inch heels standing at the podium during her closing argument. It was distracting.
Last and notable points-
- The prosecution was cool as a cucumber and steady throughout the proceedings.
- The prosecution made it a point to say in closing arguments Wendi Adelson hired KM and SG to commit the murder. No mention of Donna or Charlie. This was important because of all the speculation prior that Wendi was unaware and this murderous act was carried out on her behalf without her knowledge. The prosecution made a crystal clear point that Wendi ordered the hit.