Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, very confusing as it was widely reported that the family was in the courtroom from day one and shown during verdict.very confusing because they were shown being in the courtroom during the trial on TV
When Rivera said in the witness stand something to the effect of:
(1) “Katie recruited us (Rivera and Garcia) to kill the guy (Dan Markel) for the benefits of the lady with two kids (Wendi Adelson) and Katie’s ex-boyfriend (Charly Adelson)”;
(2) “the first attempt when we went to Tallahassee, we failed but we succeeded the second attempt”;
Were these L. Rivera statements circumstantial evidences or direct evidences?
S. Garcia’s lawyer Saam Zangeneh said to the WCTV reporters something to the effect of “Now that S. Garcia is convicted, the Adelsons should be concerned.”
When the same pieces of evidence were insufficient to convict Magbanua, because three jurors did not make the necessary inference, how could the same insufficient pieces of evidence make the alleged upper echelons above Magbanua concerned?
I am missing some dots in between ...
Karl reports 10-2.
“We kept trying to figure out what they would want to hear, what evidence they thought was missing,” one juror, who asked to remain anonymous, said of the holdout. “It kept coming back to they didn’t show enough. The discussions just kind of fell through, broke down.”
Dan Markel murder: Jury deadlocked at 10-2 in Katherine Magbanua mistrial
Yay! I like these numbers better! Thanks reallybusy!.....and from the wording this is a quote from a Guilty voter (one juror, who asked to remain anonymous, said of the holdout). I wish we could have heard more from them.....I am ready for April with new found confidence of the case.Karl reports 10-2.
“We kept trying to figure out what they would want to hear, what evidence they thought was missing,” one juror, who asked to remain anonymous, said of the holdout. “It kept coming back to they didn’t show enough. The discussions just kind of fell through, broke down.”
Dan Markel murder: Jury deadlocked at 10-2 in Katherine Magbanua mistrial
Karl reports 10-2.
“We kept trying to figure out what they would want to hear, what evidence they thought was missing,” one juror, who asked to remain anonymous, said of the holdout. “It kept coming back to they didn’t show enough. The discussions just kind of fell through, broke down.”
Dan Markel murder: Jury deadlocked at 10-2 in Katherine Magbanua mistrial
She said 9/3 from what I recall hearing and discussed here.So does that mean the Mentour Lawyer juror lied? Didn't she say 10/3?
She said 9/3 from what I recall hearing and discussed here.
I think Miss Chatty Cathy might be so into herself that she was mistaken about the final vote...CLUELESS
I don't know if I just want to believe this number because it favors how I feel but I think it is true. Etters pretty quickly retracted his original number and it has taken several weeks for him to re-report.
ETA: I told MentourLawyer about Etters article with different count
So does that mean the Mentour Lawyer juror lied? Didn't she say 10/3?
She said 9/3 from what I recall hearing and discussed here.
I think Miss Chatty Cathy might be so into herself that she was mistaken about the final vote...CLUELESS
I don't know if I just want to believe this number because it favors how I feel but I think it is true. Etters pretty quickly retracted his original number and it has taken several weeks for him to re-report.
He explained well the cross appeal that the state has submitted. During the trial, Garcia team objected to Marsy's law which would have allowed Dan's family to attend and not be sequestered during the trial. Inexplicably, the judge sided with Garcia and they were sequestered. The state believes this goes against the reasoning behind Marsy's law, (which is indeed in the state of Florida) is trying to make this situation upon appeal, case law in the future for others.
I don’t know the answer to that computantis but am becoming more and more disappointed every day and disillusioned that justice really will prevail for Dan... personally.Reggie Garcia, a lawyer and former neighbor of Dan Markel, said to WCTV reporter that Magbanua should be also tried with “others who have financed this” in subsequent trials to come.
The Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman said to the effect of “we presented all pieces of evidence we have in this case”; and, the State of Florida got a mistrial for Magbanua.
Said in a more direct way, the State of Florida does not have more pieces of evidence, circumstantial or direct, to go anywhere further such as to go after the alleged commandeers, Adelson siblings and parents.
Does it appear to be the case that the only potential and hypothetical direct evidence between the killing of Dan Markel and the alleged commandeers Adelson is K. Magbanua; if she were to flip?
Yes, there is no status of limitation for a murder in Florida but over time memories and human key witnesses fade.
Are potential and hypothetical witnesses eligible for pre-emptive witness protection program at the level of the State of Florida?
The Assistant State Attorney Georgia Cappleman said to the effect of “we presented all pieces of evidence we have in this case”; and, the State of Florida got a mistrial for Magbanua.
Is it possible that she literally meant in THIS case? She has evidence for the case against CA or DA, which is for that case, not this case? I'm I grasping at straws?