Me too.I get worse scratches and scrapes in the garden almost every week.
unless my feed is slow, its a short break, State is not done cross yet. Court tv on TV is behind so i'm also trying law and crime on ipad. Am I far behind or is she still on break to 'gather herself'?NO redirect? Surprised!
I get scratches, black and blue marks just from dealing with my dog and garden and koi pond. Moving furniture, plants, rocks.... I Always have at least 1 bruise coming up. I live alone, but look roughed up much more often than i shouldMe too.
Her waist injury is the perfect place to get a b&b or scrape, dresser bureaus are the same height and IIR: she said somewhere that she needed DB's help with a big piece (s) of furniture.
I haven't seen her face injury, are there photos available.
I'm not. No redirect means no re-cross either.NO redirect? Surprised!
AB's attorneys defense:I'm not. No redirect means no re-cross either.
JMO
yes courttv is way behind, too many commercials. I am streaming L&C and they are done with AB.unless my feed is slow, its a short break, State is not done cross yet. Court tv on TV is behind so i'm also trying law and crime on ipad. Am I far behind or is she still on break to 'gather herself'?
I think she is a faker and a liar: that said, women on the stand telling their story of domestic violence (true or not true), with tears, and a demure presentation often get away with murder-- the case could go either way but I would not be surprised if she is acquitted.Now that I've had time to actually somewhat digest whatever the heck I just watched, I think I might find myself a little bit at odds with the rest of the forum, because I'm not sure that cross examination was the win for the State that many seem to think it was. One thing that became apparent very quickly as a weakness for the State is that while there are questions about DB committing violent acts against AB, there is zero, ZERO question about AB ever being violent towards DB during the relationship before she pumped his body full of 4 hollowpoints.
If there was then they would have been something for them to exploit in that cross exam. Instead the prosecutor chose to go through the case in a very strict chronological order, and in so doing spent the vast majority of the cross exam looking more like DB's defense attorney than AB's prosecutor and was trying to nail her down with tough leading questions that AB was actually able to wriggle out of quite effectively (IMO).
And then there was the absolute madness at the end where she forced her to come out of the witness box and physically demonstrate how DB was standing during her (real or fake) emotional meltdown. I actually think that was as farcical for the state as it was for Ashley.
I don't know how this is going to go now.
JMO
I daresay she is! But my point really was that this cross examination, for the most part, reminded me more of a defense attorney cross examining a DV complainant rather than a prosecuting attorney cross examining a murder defendant. As a comparison, I've provided a link (which I won't blame anyone for not bothering to read as it's a transcript of a whole day in court) from famous former football(*) player Ryan Giggs' DV trial where his accuser is cross examined.I think she is a faker and a liar: that said, women on the stand telling their story of domestic violence (true or not true), with tears, and a demure presentation often get away with murder-- the case could go either way but I would not be surprised if she is acquitted.