FL - FSU Law Professor Dan Markel Murdered by Hitmen *3 guilty* #16

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
amicuscurie said:
In order to believe this theory, you have to believe Charlie thought Katie was not behind thr killing, she just found out her friends did it after the fact. But you also have to believe that Katie confessed to being behind murder, but is lying. But you also have to know that Katie was convicted, and there was enough evidence to convict Katie of being involved in the murder. My head hurts. Why is Katie even in jail, if his theory is true? Why was there so much evidence against her?
Click to expand...
not to mention this theory would require 3 people in federal prison who obviously no longer communicate aligning their stories to all make sense together. eye roll
 
So...one demand for money was tolerable and arrangements were made and there was no direct communication between the perpetrators (SG + RL)and the victim (CA). There was a cutout in place...KM. Additionally: CA never intended that any of his bluster or the prior communications with KM were going to lead to the death of DM; but he was fearful of the killers to the extent that he was willing to pay a lot of money to ensure that they would not kill him as well. And he trusted KM to keep him from harm and to be the channel for the payments...even after she indicated that the death of DM was a consequence of her stupidity and big mouth.
He trusts her again to identify the second round of extortionists and confirm that they were NOT LK...that led CA to conclude that the only other candidates for the 2nd extortionist was LE. And thus his mother should not pay, because paying would be an admission; whereas the fact that he had paid a large sum the night of DM's murder and continued paying for 22 months was consequence of his own fears...he was a victim.
Anyone want to buy a bridge?

And lest we forget: MOO, JMO and with sarcastic acuity
 
Odeto BJ said:
So...one demand for money was tolerable and arrangements were made and there was no direct communication between the perpetrators (SG + RL)and the victim (CA). There was a cutout in place...KM. Additionally: CA never intended that any of his bluster or the prior communications with KM were going to lead to the death of DM; but he was fearful of the killers to the extent that he was willing to pay a lot of money to ensure that they would not kill him as well. And he trusted KM to keep him from harm and to be the channel for the payments...even after she indicated that the death of DM was a consequence of her stupidity and big mouth.
He trusts her again to identify the second round of extortionists and confirm that they were NOT LK...that led CA to conclude that the only other candidates for the 2nd extortionist was LE. And thus his mother should not pay, because paying would be an admission; whereas the fact that he had paid a large sum the night of DM's murder and continued paying for 22 months was consequence of his own fears...he was a victim.
Anyone want to buy a bridge?

And lest we forget: MOO, JMO and with sarcastic acuity
Click to expand...
It is really hard to wrap your head around. Theres an internal contradiction in practically every question about calling the police or not. It’s like a house of cards, you have to believe one unbelievable thing which supports all the others. Repeatedly.
 
It must be really hard for Ruth to hear her grandchildren in the background of the recordings. They're her blood and she isn't the one who gets to put them to bed. Instead, it's the accused co-conspirators in her son's death putting them to bed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 161 more.
Total: 1,995 (members: 162, guests: 1,833)

Online statistics

Members online
162
Guests online
1,833
Total visitors
1,995
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
600,210
Messages
18,105,335
Members
230,991
Latest member
lyle.person1
Back
Top