Knitpicker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2023
- Messages
- 658
- Reaction score
- 3,147
How do you delete a post?Duh. That should've been obvious. I'm going to delete my post now.
How do you delete a post?Duh. That should've been obvious. I'm going to delete my post now.
Peter @ the "Lawyer You Know" is an approved source now at WS.
Use the edit function to delete desired text then save.How do you delete a post?
Use the edit function to delete desired text then save.
As you can see, the copy above is deleted but not what I copied from you. Seems you can’t delete everythingUse the edit function to delete desired text then save.
I plan to listen to LYK but I thought there is no statute of limitation on murder. Period.Peter @ the "Lawyer You Know" is an approved source now at WS.
He just made a video on the motion to dismiss a few hours ago.
LIVE! Adelson Says 9 Year Delay Fundamentally Unfair & Her Case Should Be Dismissed. Is She
You're correct.I plan to listen to LYK but I thought there is no statute of limitation on murder. Period.
Sounds like something DA cooked up with all her time to sit around and strategize. Or why didn’t Rash try to play the “nine years later is unfair” card for Charlie?
Oh well, the defense has to file paperwork for every possible loophole they can for a wealthy client. (In a perfect world everyone should have vigorous representation regardless of financial status.) However, claiming delays? Many things were "delayed" for as long as 3 years or more because of Covid. Justice delayed is still justice, of a sort. The hardship it causes the victim's survivors is the real injustice.I plan to listen to LYK but I thought there is no statute of limitation on murder. Period.
Sounds like something DA cooked up with all her time to sit around and strategize. Or why didn’t Rash try to play the “nine years later is unfair” card for Charlie?
If you are planning to appeal, you have to raise every possible issue or it is waived.Oh well, the defense has to file paperwork for every possible loophoe they can for a wealthy client. (In a perfect world everyone should have vigorous representation regardless of financial status.) However, claiming delays? Many things were "delayed" for as long as 3 years or more because of Covid. Justice delayed is still justice, of a sort. The hardship it causes the victim's survivors is the real injustice.
(Just another DA issue/complaint from from facing feigned suicide to whether or not she can keep a spoon/spork.) I've never heard of someone avoiding a murder trial because of long delays in an arrest. If this is the best the defense can do for DA, then the evidence her must be very strong.
I disagree with Tragos.Is that not part of a strategy to try to get Everett to limit the state's evidence on ' Outside your house' and ' ten minutes' exchanges? ( To exclude that very damaging evidence about a money drop off)
I was also surprised to hear Peter Tragos give the opinion that this is what he'd decide as a compromise if he were the Judge! He'd exclude it if it was his choice.
'Lawyer Lee ' might have a take which I'd prefer.
I agree. That evidence is important and is very incriminating.I disagree with Tragos.
In my opinion without that exchange, the case against Donna is much weaker, and that is why they are moving to exclude it. There still are the checks and the wiretaps, though, but she could possibly try to explain those away as her doing what her son told her, and then being fearful of a second extortion attempt.