Truth Prevails
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2008
- Messages
- 2,814
- Reaction score
- 4,812
I guess it would be because the perpetrator would have to do something with the victim's vehicle as he/she wouldn't want to leave it anywhere where it could point to him/her.thank you, I never heard the discussion about the gym, but if her mom says she wasn't a member, then she would know. I was asking about jogging because years ago there was a vague connection to Michelle Parker and this case that. I think this person, although never connected to Jennifer, was a jogger. So theorizing about the car, the jogging came to mind. If you drive to a crime scene, and take the victim's car, you leave your's behind and have to return for one but why return the other? That has always bothered me. On another note, I am working with different resources regarding satellite images from 10 years ago. It has been challenging but there are places that archive images from Google and private companies and counties that do it too. Sometimes you get lucky and get an image from the date of a crime, and if you are real lucky you get a lead. Maybe her parking lot or surrounding areas would be a good start.
I think you are making an excellent point, and draw attention to something really important. If the perpetrator was in the position of having both the victim's vehicle and her remains but had to go back to the scene of the abduction for his/her own transportation--why wouldn't the perp simply place the remains in the trunk?
A thought that comes to my mind when I think about that is why would the perpetrator exhibit enough forethought/knowledge to not put the remains in the vehicle's trunk, but be so careless as to leave his mode of transportation at the victim's residence and have to go back for it?
One action seems to show cunning, planning and thought; while the other seems to show none.
Sincerely--good luck with your work on the satellite images. Yes, the area of Jenn's assigned parking space and also the pond side of the condo building--I couldn't think of better places to start.
I agree, but keep in mind that Jennifer's parents believe she was abducted on her way to her car on the morning of the 24th.Speaking to the theory a worker may have done this, I have always doubted it, only because it was too risky, they would have to have resources, such as a car, a place to take her, or another vehicle, and the big one, Jennifer would never open a door to them. She had mace on her key ring, she was smart and was leary of them already. I really feel she trusted this person, enough to go outside or let them in, or at least open the door.