I'm a little confused about the bullet trajectory and hoping someone can help me out because now it's got me all skeptical.
The first three shots into Jordan's door are almost straight on, with a slight angle. How could Dunn have fired them like this if he was in the driver's seat? Seem like the angle would work more if the door was open a little?
BBM
I am not sure what you are referring to Soliloguy. I am a gun rights advocate but that certainly doesn't mean I think people should be going around shooting innocent people for nothing.
Being a legal gun owner has nothing to do with this case, and respectfully, it is offensive to me that it is invoked. I know countless legal gun owners and not one of them believes what Dunn did was justified. There is absolutely nothing to base this assumption on that there is someone on the jury that owns a gun so therefore they are thinking about setting a murderer free. Legal gun owners are some of the most law abiding citizens ever and with there being over a 100 million of them they sit on cases as jurors all across America and bring justice to victims over and over again.
I imagine they are wrestling with first degree or second degree.
Or there may be some idiot on there that thinks that Jordan just had to do something to provoke this shooting or Dunn would have never fired.:banghead: I hope to hell not but I wouldn't be surprised.
IMO
There is nothing wrong with supporting a constitutional right. The fact that you think they would have to be 'stealthy' is concerning. It's a shame when someone that advocates for the rights provided by our constitution have to do so 'quietly'.I'm afraid it's time to ask this question: Does anybody remember the legal name of that shot-across-the-bow warning given by the judge to a deadlocked jury telling them to go back in and try harder to reach a consensus? I am fearful that the next "jury question" will relate to their discord and that this judge will be obligated to further encourage them. But, I can't remember what that encouragement is called.
ETA: I think we have one or more "stealth" gun rights advocates on this jury.
I completely agree with you. I don't think it's legitimately a gun rights issue either. I just think there are others out there with MD's mindset who aren't willing to see beyond a potential loss of their "rights" as they believe them to be and are perfectly willing to carry that mindset into jury deliberations. In fact, that's exactly what he was hoping for in his letters. I won't quote him because it's offensive.
There is nothing wrong with supporting a constitutional right. The fact that you think they would have to be 'stealthy' is concerning. It's a shame when someone that advocates for the rights provided by our constitution have to do so 'quietly'.
I'm a 2nd amendment supporter and I don't understand how this wasn't a 5 minute verdict. This man should be in prison for the rest of his life.
An idiot committing a crime has nothing to do with 'gun rights'.
JMO
Larry Hannan ‏@LarryHannan 2m
By my count the jury has now deliberated for 16 hourx by my count. #dunntrial
There is nothing wrong with supporting a constitutional right. The fact that you think they would have to be 'stealthy' is concerning. It's a shame when someone that advocates for the rights provided by our constitution have to do so 'quietly'.
I'm a 2nd amendment supporter and I don't understand how this wasn't a 5 minute verdict. This man should be in prison for the rest of his life.
An idiot committing a crime has nothing to do with 'gun rights'.
JMO
Darn It! Went and ran some errands, and figured by the time I got back there would be a verdict!
:waiting:
If it has come down to am impasse between M1 and M2, I think the M1 jurors will cave before the M2's. Just my opinion.
Darn It! Went and ran some errands, and figured by the time I got back there would be a verdict!
:waiting:
I do not think this is a gun's right issue. My fear would be someone who has the same mindset as MD has being on the jury. Most responsible gun owners would not have gotten into a confrontation unless it was unavoidable. As these jurors will soon find out MD used his gun as a threat in the past. It was only a matter of time before he used it in reality. He's just a bully with a gun. jmo