It doesn't seem right that the mom is getting crapped on here at WS.
She's a mother, advocating for her child. My child is nearly 30 and I would do the same thing. Especially if that Dad onsite wasn't seeing to it that his child is properly monitored for a serious health issue. Shrug.
If one takes the time to look at the YEARS of court records, it is glaringly obvious that she did not 'desert' her child, dumping him to go raise her other children, etc.
When I was a kid I wanted to go live with my non-custodial parent, I think that many if not most children of divorce want that from time to time, at least. I didn't kill anyone because of it.
Then again...I wasn't in a household that made me run until I puked. You can see by the court records that she did have deep concern over alleged physical abuse at the hands of Dad. With 200+ court filings, back and forth, it sure doesn't appear to me that she just ditched her kid and never tried to get custody, never considered his well-being, etc. Quite the opposite in fact.
It appears that the decision to not change his living situation was based on wanting the best for their child. I can't blame either the mom or the dad for that, really.
Honestly, if I think about who influenced how this kid turned out, I have to take into account who had day to day influence on him, year after year.
And even then, I can't 'blame' the dad for Logan's horrific act, if it turns out that he just up and killed his dear grandmother all on his own.
I think some might be looking for someone to 'blame' for this tragedy, but I don't think we know nearly enough facts to do so yet.
Ultimately Logan Mott is the one accused of pulling the trigger/plunging the knife and being angry at his parents isn't really a good justification for doing so.
This is all my own opinion, of course.