Yikes
@Pruddennce ….. that is all quite disturbing IMO too.
This jumps off the page to me:
“JS: that's where I'm at I'm I know that the sexual sexual acts happened but I'm not convinced that he didn't take her to school
I'm not convinced that he's the reason she's gone cuz if this had been going on for so long”
I don’t know what to make of that. Yet. But it almost appears IMO that a question to JS is that if this had been going on for so long, why did this occur* this weekend, why now? (And the first ‘this’ seems to be the now disclosed abuse / SA of MS.) In other words……. is JS here acknowledging that the events have been occurring previously, and thus there couldn’t really be a reason for this to have now happened IMO?
It almost seems her also now acknowledging a trigger or motive? She even uses the word motive! “
what’s the motive?” Is that IMO an attempt to almost condone the behavior? SMH
*And context from the other part of the excerpt is when she says why Monday? Essentially why now?
One can only imagine what investigators, prosecutors, and the district attorney are pondering in this. MOO