GUILTY FL - Markeis McGlockton, killed following parking dispute, Clearwater, 19 July 2018

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
If they play the video in slow motion, frame by frame, I don’t think he will be convicted. You see McGlockton take a step toward Drejka after he’s already on the ground.
The defense fought against the slow motion video. I think it will clearly show that McGlockton was retreating. But I do think reasonable minds can differ on this one. Jury selection was the huge determination here, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Florida man who fatally shot an unarmed black man during a dispute over a handicapped parking space told detectives he fired because he had been pushed to the ground and he feared the man was about to "finish" what he started.

Prosecutors played Michael Drejka's interview with Pinellas County detectives Thursday. Drejka is on trial in Clearwater for manslaughter for the July 2018 death of Markeis McGlockton.

Security video shows Drejka confronted McGlockton's girlfriend in her car outside a convenience store. McGlockton came outside and pushed Drejka to the ground. Drejka pulled a handgun and fired, killing McGlockton.

Drejka is white. He told the detectives he has a "pet peeve" about illegal parking in handicapped spots, so he confronted the girlfriend. He said he didn't see McGlockton before he was pushed.
Parking lot shooter told detectives he feared severe injury
 
Court TV‏Verified account @CourtTV 25m25 minutes ago
Read the FULL transcript from #MichaelDrejka's police interview on July 19, 2018.
Tune in to #CourtTV for LIVE coverage of FL v. Drejka.

https://www.courttv.com/news/fl-v-drejka-police-interview-transcript/
FL V. DREJKA POLICE INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT
August 22, 2019

71 pages:
https://storage.googleapis.com/www-...9bd646-drejka-police-interview-transcript.pdf

PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
PCSO - SUPPLEMENT SO18-225724/31
Report Date: 07/19/2018

 
Thursday morning, prosecutors played Michael Drejka’s interview with Pinellas County detectives,

Richard “Ricky” Kelly, an employee at AA Septic Company, testified about a previous threatening incident with Drejka at that same convenience store similar to the fatal shooting.

Kelly, who drives a tanker, said he went to the Circle A convenience store in February 2018 and parked in a handicap-accessible spot. He went inside the store and when he came out, he saw Drejka taking pictures of his tanker.

They got into a dispute about the parking spot, as Drejka said his mother was disabled, and the situation quickly escalated.

“He said, ‘I should shoot you, kill you,'” Kelly said.

Drejka walked back to his own vehicle and then walked back toward Kelly, he testified. Finally, the owner of the store came out to calm down the situation, and Kelly then left the scene, he said.

Kelly’s boss, John Tyler, then received a phone call from Drejka about the incident, Tyler testified. Drejka said his employee had been parked in a handicap-accessible spot and had been rude, Tyler testified.

“He said, ‘If I had a gun, I could have shot him,'” Tyler testified. “I said, ‘I’m sorry that you would feel that way. I carry a gun and my training I was taught to remove myself from those situations. Don’t let yourself get into those situations.'”

The conversation continued in circles, so they agreed to disagree, Tyler said.
Florida Man Charged In Deadly Parking Lot Shooting Said He Feared For His Life
 
Thursday morning, prosecutors played Michael Drejka’s interview with Pinellas County detectives,

Richard “Ricky” Kelly, an employee at AA Septic Company, testified about a previous threatening incident with Drejka at that same convenience store similar to the fatal shooting.

Kelly, who drives a tanker, said he went to the Circle A convenience store in February 2018 and parked in a handicap-accessible spot. He went inside the store and when he came out, he saw Drejka taking pictures of his tanker.

They got into a dispute about the parking spot, as Drejka said his mother was disabled, and the situation quickly escalated.

“He said, ‘I should shoot you, kill you,'” Kelly said.

Drejka walked back to his own vehicle and then walked back toward Kelly, he testified. Finally, the owner of the store came out to calm down the situation, and Kelly then left the scene, he said.

Kelly’s boss, John Tyler, then received a phone call from Drejka about the incident, Tyler testified. Drejka said his employee had been parked in a handicap-accessible spot and had been rude, Tyler testified.

“He said, ‘If I had a gun, I could have shot him,'” Tyler testified. “I said, ‘I’m sorry that you would feel that way. I carry a gun and my training I was taught to remove myself from those situations. Don’t let yourself get into those situations.'”

The conversation continued in circles, so they agreed to disagree, Tyler said.
Florida Man Charged In Deadly Parking Lot Shooting Said He Feared For His Life

Egads. Even as someone with a disability I can't see myself getting that worked up about a disabled parking spot -- and I've rarely if ever noticed incidents of abled-bodied persons abusing them, likely because I'm not obsessively focused on it as he seems to have been. This guy strikes me as someone who was primarily looking to shoot someone and secondarily championing disability rights (if at all). A pretty flimsy pretext for deadly aggression, IMO.
 
The defense fought against the slow motion video. I think it will clearly show that McGlockton was retreating. But I do think reasonable minds can differ on this one. Jury selection was the huge determination here, IMO.


I watched the opening statements, and I had to laugh more than 5 times because the defense attorney kept saying don't look at it in slow motion. But yet he played it in slow motion about 7 times!
 
This guy strikes me as someone who was primarily looking to shoot someone and secondarily championing disability rights (if at all). A pretty flimsy pretext for deadly aggression, IMO.

I think this sums Drejka very well. The man was trawling for a pretense to kill somebody- and eventually he found one.

The driver and supervisor have both testified that Drejka directly threatened to kill people in the past (evidently for being "rude"). Another individual testified that Drejka initially stated that he shot the victim for pushing him down, not because he feared a grave threat. Then factor in that Drejka expressed an indirect willingness fight the victim's boyfriend just prior to the shooting.

I wish Florida would have went for Murder 2 as the testimony appears credible and shows Drejka having a preconceived intent to shoot somebody and looking for pretense. Hoping for thirty year sentence.... .
 
Last edited:
I watched the opening statements, and I had to laugh more than 5 times because the defense attorney kept saying don't look at it in slow motion. But yet he played it in slow motion about 7 times!
Slow motion? I don't see any 'slow motion' video played by defense attorney.
Michael Drejka Trial Defense Opening Statement 08/21/19
 
Egads. Even as someone with a disability I can't see myself getting that worked up about a disabled parking spot -- and I've rarely if ever noticed incidents of abled-bodied persons abusing them, likely because I'm not obsessively focused on it as he seems to have been. This guy strikes me as someone who was primarily looking to shoot someone and secondarily championing disability rights (if at all). A pretty flimsy pretext for deadly aggression, IMO.
abled-bodied persons abusing disabled parking . . .
https://www.google.com/search?ei=cf...hUKEwjUmpu3oJfkAhXG1lkKHWNkBLAQ4dUDCAo&uact=5

Handicapped Parking Fraud - Handicapped Parking Violators - Help Make a Difference
https://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/2016-121.pdf

LA Hikes Penalty For Disabled Parking Placard Abuse To $1,100
Handicap Placard Misuse Rises, DMV Cracks Down | HuffPost
Column: It takes a special arrogance to steal a parking place from a disabled person. And this cop is out to bust you
Police crack down on accessible parking misuse


App could crack down on handicapped parking violators
App could crack down on handicapped parking violators

In a recent presentation, Parking Mobility said it could unleash a small army of volunteers to "tell" on handicapped parking violators.
Updated: 12:11 AM EDT September 27, 2016
Tampa, FL -- Imagine a small army of people out there looking for folks who are parked illegally in spaces reserved for the handicapped.

Well, apparently there's an app for that.

A Texas-based group called Parking Mobility wants to bring the technology to Tampa Bay, and was in town this month trying to sell officials on why it would work here.
[...]
 
Chanley Shá Painter‏ @ChanleyCourtTV 8m8 minutes ago
1 male on the jury is asian and the sole female is ethnically ambiguous #courttv

Kathryn Varn‏Verified account @kathrynvarn 22m22 minutes ago
We have a jury. Five men and one woman will decide whether Michael Drejka shot Markeis McGlockton in self-defense. None are black.

Saundra WeathersOnTV‏Verified account @SaundraONTV 23m23 minutes ago
BREAKING: Jury SELECTED in the #MichaelDrejka trial. Five men, one woman. Only one minority (Asian). Three alternates, 2 women(White), 1 man(White). No African Americans on the jury.
SMH. JMO.


Glad to see MSM acknowledge the 4th child, since Britany was pregnant when Markeis was killed and they didn't even know she was pregnant yet. Markeis had 4 children and left 4 children behind.

That was quicker than I expected, but I haven't been able to watch live. What are everyone's opinions so far, for those who have been able to watch?
 
Last edited:
What are everyone's opinions so far, for those who have been able to watch?
Though I have not been able to watch, my guess is that Drejka's ship is sinking fast.

Subjectively, it helps for a jury to sympathize with the defendant. In self defense cases that probably includes a juror seeing himself Drejka's position. In this case, such a juror would have to see himself:

- Directly confronting people over the parking issue (not just say, writing down license plates etc)
- Threatening to shoot someone previously. Then repeating the threat in a later phone call.
- Engaging in a profanity laden conversation with a woman and stating a willingness to fight the woman's boy friend.

Though a juror does not need to have positive impression of a Drejka's actions to find self defense, positive impressions could lead to a pro defendant spin on interpreting other evidence.

I wonder if Drejka will testify? Such moves are risky- especially for people with Drejka's apparent personality traits. But... the ship seems to have sunken so deeply, it might be worth the risk.
 
Last edited:
After watching some of the trial I will be surprised if he’s convicted.

Not one single witness said that MD made any threats to anyone. You have BJ telling MD that her man was going to F him up. Then MM violently pushing MD to the ground. MM never said a word. He didn’t try to find out what was going on, he just attacked. MD believed that MM was going to finish what he started. I can see that, because had it not been for the firearm, I think MM would have continued. IMO MM only backs away when the firearm is brandished, by that time the wheels are in motion and it’s too late.

You never know what a jury will decide but hopefully the law will be applied in this case.
 
2005 Florida Code - :: CRIMES :: JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCEChapter 776

776.012 Use of force in defense of person.--A person is justified in using force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to defend himself or herself or another against the other's imminent use of unlawful force. However, a person is justified in the use of deadly force and does not have a duty to retreat if:

(1) He or she reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony; or

(2) Under those circumstances permitted pursuant to s. 776.013.
 
I believe you can look at the encounter between Markeis and Drejka in more than one way.

If a person has watched the trial there was a forensic specialist on for the Prosecution. He explained the details of threat. I am sorry I can't remember his exact title.

He explained the threat levels from the lowest to the highest and how an individual should react. Granted you can't always predict how you will react to an encounter. The information he presented was very informative and helped to understand the meaning of imminent threat.

The witness is Roy Bedard starting around the 24 min mark.


When it come down to it the jury will have to decide who was right or wrong.

In my opinion I think Markeis should not have shoved Drejka in turn I don't think Drejka should have shot Markeis. again imo
 

The defense is not citing Florida's Stand your Ground law. In addition, the defense has not claimed that Florida law inherently forbids the prosecution of Drejka and the judge has accepted the charges and the trial as lawful.

I believe that the prosecution's ability to bring charges against Drejka and Zimmerman (Martin case) is based on another provision of Florida Law that stipulates those initiating confrontations have a higher burden of proof.

In short, the cited provision might not be the only component of Florida Laws governing self defense. If there is confusion, Florida's legislature has a moral obligation to re word the law as clearly people like Drejka feel empowered by it.

In contrast, the Texas law clearly states that one cannot provoke or incite another individual, then "SYG". Florida may have a similar concept where the burden of proof is increased, but it is buried in other provisions.

Any attorneys or other people know what makes Deka's prosecution lawful?
 
Last edited:

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
96
Guests online
142
Total visitors
238

Forum statistics

Threads
608,561
Messages
18,241,350
Members
234,401
Latest member
CRIM1959
Back
Top