I went over the transcripts of CA and KC's interviews with LE, hundreds of pages just for CA, actually, hers were longer than KC's....that woman just goes on and on.... I pulled an old report from an FBI agent that was published on the web in 1996, the article discusses reviewing transcripts for inconsistencies and revealing/disqualifying statements. I started out using colored highlighters to mark where I found an inconsistency, sentences that had disqualifying words or statements (words used subconsciously when we are lying) and what one of our wise WS'ers named "word salad", actually word salad is not technical name, but it should be, sentences that contain unusual information that doesn't seem to fit, words in an order that make no sense, etc., which we know the A's are famous for. According to the FBI, when a person uses "word salad" it is an indication that something has changed (in their heads) about the story they are telling so they simply babble or make statements that don't fit with the conversation. (example statement: "I was going to the store to buy milk, I hate how hot it is so I never wear shoes, then I got home and put the milk in the refrigerater" this statement would indicate that something happened when the person telling the story went to the store that they do not want to discuss) So anyhow, I started out with my colored markers and gave up after 3 pages, because every single sentence out of both their mouths showed indications of deception and lies. By time the time I finished reading both transcripts and making my notes (as I did back in my trial prep days) I knew for certain that most any idiot could see through their lies. CA babbles and babbles saying absolutely nothing at times except spewing random words. I think her use of "red flags" has been the most obvious abuse of the truth so far. She uses that to suit her need, she sees them when it works for her and doesn't see them when it makes her look bad.
