beccalecca1
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2011
- Messages
- 856
- Reaction score
- 0
Going out a couple of nights?? For real? When is 31 days and nights considered a couple of nights?
There is zero evidence, none, nada that she is a victim of abuse. That so called expert never reviewed Casey personally. Anyoen can find an expert to say anything they want them to say. Where's the proof?
I would say that many convicted criminals were victims of abuse of some form or another,should they all get a pass too?
There was no evidence to reflect her partying it up for 31 days straight. None. She was going out on the Fridays at Fusion, and I'm not sure if there were any other times in between (I'm assuming there was at least 1 or 2). But, she didn't party it up for 31 days.
The expert was a grief expert, not a sexual abuse expert. Her purpose there was to show what she has experienced as grief in people. How they behave, etc. She painted a picture of Casey when talking about young 20 something who grieve. She then went on to say that it was unhealthy grieving, but it is grieving still.
I watched this trial with eyes that didn't have so much emotion invested. I wanted to try to see if I'd convict her if I was on the jury. After the prosecution rested, I knew there'd be no way unless the defense made a mistake and introduced more evidence for the prosecution's side. By the end of trial, I figured the exact same thing as the jury did. She didn't murder her child, she didn't accidently kill her child, she didn't abuse her child. She lied. That was all I could see. Besides her having an abnormal thought process.