No offense, but, I'm not at all into the back and forth of posts or tag teaming and being frustrated with having to justify my position and my own evaluation of the evidence as on the other SA is innocent threads. The same evidence, presented in a court of law, which led a jury, of his peers, to find SA guilty. I'm not one of the planted evidence and cops railroaded this person theorists.
Life is frustrating enough. I'm old and I'm tired. No, I am not going to go back and reread every inch of this case. I'm not going to pick apart each and every word or whatever else there appears to be picked apart. That's kinda why I chose to post here. This thread is an "agree with the evidence/guilt of SA" thread. When I'm gonna discuss evidence, I'll go back and get supporting facts. When I'm gonna express my opinion or theory, I'll express it, without the frustration of continuously defending it.
Yes, I'm a boring wuss and want a discussion that's argument free, with people who don't tell me to "go back and reacquaint myself" with all the case documents so I can pick apart every little wrong word or phrase.
I posted one comment on the Zellner Tweets thread and chose not to continue because, basically, (my words, not those told to me) it was an agree with Zellner, no "what ifs", don't insult her, this is a "defense" type of thread. I accept that and totally understand and respect the fact that people, who believe contrary to myself and LE, are fighting, for what they believe, is an innocent man sitting in prison for a crime, they feel, he did not commit. Good for all of you. That's what the system is based on. Keep on keepin' on!