Muy Curioso
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 259
- Reaction score
- 261
The key question is if he is the same motorcyclist who was seen by Brett Martin about 5 or 10 minutes before arriving at crime scene. The two forest workers saw the motorcyclist about 3 p.m, (and was strange that if he was the killer, he had shown his face). If he left the area at that time, then he has nothing to do with the crime and certainly can not contribute anything. In that case, another motorcyclist, surely the killer, crossed with Martin.
But If he is the same who was seen by Martin, the mystery would be multiplied by 100, since then, how escaped the killer? The place of the crime is a mousetrap, with only two exits with a vehicle. A witness has said that no vehicle passed through the Col de Chérel (exit to the south) at the time of the crime. And the only other way out was the route towards Bret Martin (north). If the motorcyclist who was seen by Martin was not the killer, how escaped ?, walking?
Moreover, dismiss someone for his professional profile, when they have no idea who could have committed the crime or the motive, ...It is more than daring. How professions are discarded? A doctor yes, a lawyer not, a miner yes, a farmer not ... I am afraid they are being guided by prejudice, and that is very serious when investigation has collapsed completely.
Or they change their way of thinking, or this crime never will be solved.
But If he is the same who was seen by Martin, the mystery would be multiplied by 100, since then, how escaped the killer? The place of the crime is a mousetrap, with only two exits with a vehicle. A witness has said that no vehicle passed through the Col de Chérel (exit to the south) at the time of the crime. And the only other way out was the route towards Bret Martin (north). If the motorcyclist who was seen by Martin was not the killer, how escaped ?, walking?
Moreover, dismiss someone for his professional profile, when they have no idea who could have committed the crime or the motive, ...It is more than daring. How professions are discarded? A doctor yes, a lawyer not, a miner yes, a farmer not ... I am afraid they are being guided by prejudice, and that is very serious when investigation has collapsed completely.
Or they change their way of thinking, or this crime never will be solved.