no nonsense
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2015
- Messages
- 128
- Reaction score
- 770
He will never, ever admit guilt to anything.
I've been wondering about the other states with fake electors. I mean, come on, get moving!![]()
Georgia plea deal in fake electors case could give Arizona AG's investigation more leverage, attorneys say
Chesebro's future disclosures could undercut defense by slate of 11 phony Trump electorswww.12news.com
Georgia plea deal in fake electors case could give Arizona AG's investigation more leverage, attorneys say
Chesebro's future disclosures could undercut defense by slate of 11 phony Trump electors
Wow. She is not only stating she was extorted to plea (huh?), but she's actively promoting the idea and continues saying election was stolen.![]()
Sidney Powell pushes claims that 2020 election was rigged and prosecutors 'extorted' her after she pleaded guilty to election interference
Sidney Powell has continued to push conspiracy theories claiming the 2020 US election was rigged after she pleaded guilty to election interference.www.businessinsider.com
Probably. But why? Don't most people think she's a kook who tells lies? She even said her tales are so fantastical that nobody should believe them. Sounds like she thinks of herself as a writer (read the transcript of her J6 deposition - at one point during the testimony she recites the blurb of a book she wrote, touting it as a page turner) and is living a fantasy life by weaving stories around her.My guess is Ms Powell is trying to save face with her bunch of followers.
My guess is Ms Powell is trying to save face with her bunch of followers.
![]()
Sidney Powell pushes claims that 2020 election was rigged and prosecutors 'extorted' her after she pleaded guilty to election interference
Sidney Powell has continued to push conspiracy theories claiming the 2020 US election was rigged after she pleaded guilty to election interference.www.businessinsider.com
Of course, that has been her strategy all along. I think it will backfire badly because it is so obvious the entire prosecution is politically motivated. She should have let Jack Smith take the lead and stayed out of it. Meanwhile, Trump will continue to dig a big hole with his flapping mouth.Legal experts: Trump's defense may be doomed as 5 more co-defendants seek Fulton plea deals
![]()
Legal experts: Trump's defense may be doomed as 5 more co-defendants seek Fulton plea deals
Willis “never wanted to try 19 defendants. She wanted 18 guilty pleas and one trial against Donald Trump": lawyernews.yahoo.com
District Attorney Fani Willis' office has a clearly defined strategy: to persuade as many co-defendants as they can to cooperate against Trump “to convict” the most serious offenders, legal experts say.
“This has been Willis’ strategy the whole time,” former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Salon. “She never wanted to try 19 defendants. She wanted 18 guilty pleas and one trial against Donald Trump.”
Curious that you still think this is just a politically motivated exercise.Of course, that has been her strategy all along. I think it will backfire badly because it is so obvious the entire prosecution is politically motivated. She should have let Jack Smith take the lead and stayed out of it. Meanwhile, Trump will continue to dig a big hole with his flapping mouth.
JMO
They are pleading guilty to misdemeanors and are doing it because <modsnip: No link to support the reason you have stated as fact>. Yes, I think the weaponization of a system of justice to advance her political career as Willis has obviously done is very, very wrong.Curious that you still think this is just a politically motivated exercise.
These people are admitting to very serious crimes.
Do you think they should not have been charged even though they are admitting their guilt ?
Jmo
Someone trying to advance their career by prosecuting false or (pardon the pun) trumped-up charges on innocent people would be wrong, IMO.They are pleading guilty to misdemeanors and are doing it because lawyers representing them are very expensive.
Yes, I think the weaponization of a system of justice to advance her political career as Willis has obviously done is very, very wrong.
JMO
Right. I reject the put down of a hardworking public servant. Building a career is not wrong. Willis is doing her job, and she's doing it well. The defendants in the case committed crimes, and there was a king pin responsible for it. Her strategy is to go after the king pins.Someone trying to advance their career by prosecuting false or (pardon the pun) trumped-up charges on innocent people would be wrong, IMO.
Someone advancing their career by prosecuting people who have actually (or probably) committed crimes is okay by me. It's pretty much a truism that prosecution of criminals will equate to a successful career for the prosecutor, yeah.
In fact, if a person is reasonably suspected of criminal activity, I don't think the various personal motivations of the prosecutor matter one bit -- as long as the law is followed, meaning a fair trial -- criminals should be prosecuted, period.
Any prosecutor who would NOT put full effort into prosecuting a likely criminal just because they like or hold the same political views as the criminal, is being unethical and should be fired or censured. IMO.