http://www.ajc.com/news/ryan-brunns-trail-contains-1255081.html
Ryan Brunn's trail contains few clues
Ryan Brunn's trail contains few clues
anyone else wonder if RB might have made the wrong new 'friends' when he moved, and got caught up in some sick, horrendous mess?
(not quite the same, but reminds me of a time a 'cool' gal back in school asked me to go to the store with her...naive me...not so cool, she was a shoplifter...I remained a nerd, ha)
hmmm I was thinking like gang types. From his FB he didn't seem to have a lot of close friends, what little I caught. Trying to fit in kind of thing? maybe I don't know, just trying to figure where he got lost
hmmm I was thinking like gang types. From his FB he didn't seem to have a lot of close friends, what little I caught. Trying to fit in kind of thing? maybe I don't know, just trying to figure where he got lost
---was there more than the one reference to his being "on the run" that was made by ryanB's brother?
--( that brother was on the phone w/ ryanB when he was arrested , he told him "i gotta go"----so the brother would have got that info from ryanB.)
--i never saw that he had "disappeared" anywhere...by anyone else posting it.
Where did this information come from? I have not seen it stated before anywhere else. Not doubting, just would like to read it. ty
http://www.ajc.com/news/ryan-brunns-trail-contains-1255081.html
Ryan Brunn's trail contains few clues
This is weird because there are conflicting reports about two things. In the above article it says the kids were all 'foster children.' But other reports say they were adopted. And those are two very different things.
Also, in the above article, it said that in court he said he had a 10th grade education. But other articles have said he had his GED. But if he said in court he only had a 10th grade education then I bet he did not have the GED.
It is sad that the article said that his parents rarely attended any of his football games or school events. That is really sad imo.
http://www.ajc.com/news/ryan-brunns-trail-contains-1255081.html
Ryan Brunn's trail contains few clues
I am curious as to why/what will take months of evidence gathering yet provided enough right away to make an arrest...I DO think they know they have the right person, just wondering what they found so quickly (a fingerprint match? bloodly items?) yet still requires "months" of evidence gathering.
Only because we see so many cases (endless, it seems) where there is a definte POI yet no arrests. Clearly, LE has some solid evidence linking him directly to the crime (IMO), but expect much more that will take a while to develop? Still, months? Just seems odd to me. Nothing really should take months anymore, in a child murder. JMO
Driving around in front of the playground and staring at the children is imo suspicious behavior. being seen at the trash compactor the night of the abduction is also, IMO suspicious. What legal and reasonable purpose could he have to sneak out to the compactor that night?
http://www.ajc.com/news/ryan-brunns-trail-contains-1255081.html
Ryan Brunn's trail contains few clues
But there should be no reason for him to have her blood on any of his clothing or for any of his DNA to be found on her body. Because I think that is what he will be dealing with, evidence wise.
Anyone else feel that it was unfair of the journalist to point out the although RB didn't have a prior record, his brothers did? They are not implicated in this crime and, as far as I can see, are just collateral damage. These guys didn't do anything but have the unfortunate luck to be related to RB. Why should the reporter sully their names even more by writing about thier unrelated and, IMO, minor crimes?