FerrariRose
Active Member
- Joined
- May 23, 2015
- Messages
- 263
- Reaction score
- 217
Maybe the cane is actually a sharpe object in a holder..I dunno.
I thought the same thing.
Maybe the cane is actually a sharpe object in a holder..I dunno.
It looks like a cell phone.Can anyone tell what the man with the cane and red stained shirt is holding in his left hand?
It looks like a cell phone.
Remember, they said the public is safe. So safety is not an issue because the killer is probably under surveillance. They can't release a name or a photo because their investigation is ongoing.
Yes there is. There is software out there that tracks cell phone data from retailers and shows where people go from store to store so absolutely right they can track it. Privacy should not be protected for murder investigations but at the same time unrelated findings should also not be prosecuted Ie- a murderer shouldn’t have rights if their victim no longer has their rights.If it is a cell phone, is there any way for LE to see what phones were pinging in that area and track potential witnesses or perps that way?
If the time stamp on the photo is correct, he almost certainly is not the killer. He seen leaving the park at the time Katie would be entering the park. I just don't think its possible he is the killer.I’m most bothered by the man with the cane for three reasons
1. He’s got on what appears to be a bloody shirt near where a murder happened
2. What better way to allow someone to take their guard down than by appearing to be very slow moving or disabled
3. A friend of mine was recently attacked by the same breed as Bowie. His injury was on his torso right beneath his arm pit. If that is blood on that mans shirt there may very well be a bite mark beneath.
All speculation, of course
Here is the approximate temperature after midnight.Who wears a hoodie while running outdoors on a hot Atlanta summer night? That witness picture bothered me.
Atlanta is hilly and Piedmont Park has uneven terrain with occasional potholes, so it's easier to explain away a cane.
(edited)
Anything is possible but the chances of being a victim of violent crime by a US citizen are far greater, if you believe in math and science.Would there be any reason to think that the perp(s) are from outside the US or new to the country?
Maybe from a place where really horrific crimes (often directed at females) regularly occur, like some kind of cartel etc...? imo, speculation.
That time stamp is critical in my opinion. i had never questioned it before, but maybe we should be. APD has gone pretty quiet on this case lately. I'd like a local reporter to start asking some questions about some of this stuff.Thank you! i also think the timestamp looks like it was applied to the image.
The time they were in the crosswalk is important, imo. I question whether 12:09 is correct. The 1 hour 2min. window from 12:09-1:11 seems so narrow to me.
Yep, that's why they call them sweat shirts and sweat pants, some even take it to another level and wear neoprene.Here is the approximate temperature after midnight.
Looks like 77°.
Personally I couldn't wear a hoodie unless it's below 50°.
I guess some people want to sweat when they walk, run...
Moo View attachment 309444
Exactly. Hoodies are very common even in hot summer heat. I see them all the time. Hoodie man is interesting because of the timing, not the hoodie.The hoodie person is curious because of the timeline, imo, more so than because of the hoodie itself. The hoodie could be normal attire for that person, or possibly hiding other illegal activities like drugs and cash from dealing, a gun, stolen goods, whatever. Jmo.
It wouldn't make it inadmissible per se, but a defense attorney could make a good argument that it is worthless. The City or state or whoever runs those cameras, will have to have an expert to testify about those time stamps. I would be willing to bet that they are accurate. However, the time stamp on the photo of Katie crossing the rainbow cross walk is different.@PrairieWind I have a question about the timestamps. For the footage we have seen that does include original timestamps (like the jogger or hoodie), are these shots from APD or city operated cameras that would be using the video footage as potential evidence in court against traffic violations, etc.? If so, an inaccurate timestamp would make it inadmissible, wouldn't it?
@PrairieWind I have a question about the timestamps. For the footage we have seen that does include original timestamps (like the jogger or hoodie), are these shots from APD or city operated cameras that would be using the video footage as potential evidence in court against traffic violations, etc.? If so, an inaccurate timestamp would make it inadmissible, wouldn't it?