Could you imagine what the testimony would be like if they questioned whose organs were in the pictures Ross Harris sent? I remember a scene from Porky's...
Wait, are you saying Ross' talleywacker has a mole on it??
Lolololololol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could you imagine what the testimony would be like if they questioned whose organs were in the pictures Ross Harris sent? I remember a scene from Porky's...
This is a good timeline... it was 3:16 that RH sent the text to LH
http://www.ajc.com/news/news/inside-the-courtroom/ngYcc/
I think they're going to have a very hard time getting the sexting in at trial unless he was doing it between Chik-Fil-A and getting to work. Otherwise, the argument will be that it's no more distracting than being at work or doing anything else, really. That's what the defense lawyer was setting up, imo, and I think he has a pretty good chance of excluding it. Not that it matters, since the entire country knows about it now.
I have heard mentioned again and again about the grandmother. Link please
Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2
Keep in mind we do not know exactly how Cooper was in the back of the car, he may have been able to wiggle free a bit.
Tried them both harressed in their nautilus. Man I forgot how to put that thing together. My 8 yr old can technically fit the harress, she still meets the requirements, my 6 yr old is exceeds them.
The crotch strap was set the furtherest away it was the right spot for my 8 yr old but under my 6yr olds... figured I would not try the other one since we are dealing with a boy lol. Shoulder strap set at the lowest setting. I did not put the extra padding in which might have made them not able to wiggle as freely as they were able to b/c they had a bit of room on each side. I had them try the chest buckle to see if they could break free. 8 yr old came closest to getting free but no dice, the chest strap was so tight it was hard to open. The leg straps were the thing that was hardest on them ( but to be fair this is one of the recalled crotch buckle seats. We never had issues before and I did not have issues today, so maybe their thumbs are not strong enough) Then I told them they were not allowed to use strength to get out but they could wiggle. They were able to just wiggle their shoulders out of the straps and then pull arms out but then they were not able to get out the leg straps. I let them try to unbuckle chest strap again. My 8yr old was able to break free from the chest buckle but legs still stuck but my 6 yr old was still stuck.
Next I pulled the straps up to the highest setting where it should be for my 8yr ( if we still had her harressed) Neither were able to break free by wiggling. 8 yr old able to unbunkle the chest the crotch buckle still to hard. 6 yr old was still stuck b/c it was so tight on him still.
The buckles always were hard to undo if it was tight. That was one way we used to know when we needed to adjust the straps at all.
Hope that makes sense.. neighbors are popping the last of their firecrackers right now and they have my puppies going insane ( running, barking and jumping in my lap ) so my brain is not able to fully function.
ETA: I pulled the straps as tight as I could without hurting my kids so I asked them to be uncomfortable for a bit. I could not slip my pinky between them and the strap.
When LH arrived at daycare and upon finding out that Ross didn't drop Cooper off that morning, rather than "Ross must have left him in the car", why didn't she say "I just heard from him not too long ago and he asked when I was going to pick up his little buddy"? That to me is the key piece that tells me she was in on all of this. SO much doesn't make sense, and we are likely going to have to wait a year or longer to get answers on a lot of this.
There were no texts between RH and LH that day. I am re-watching the hearing here....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9u--A2TwZg
UNIDENTIFIED PROSECUTOR: Did the defendant mention getting texts from his wife that afternoon as well?
STODDARD: No.
UNIDENTIFIED PROSECUTOR: Did his phone reflect anything about texts from his wife?
STODDARD: No.
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1407/03/wolf.02.html
He does say there are no texts between RH and LH that day.x
UNIDENTIFIED PROSECUTOR: Did the defendant mention getting texts from his wife that afternoon as well?
STODDARD: No.
UNIDENTIFIED PROSECUTOR: Did his phone reflect anything about texts from his wife?
STODDARD: No.
http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1407/03/wolf.02.html
He does say there are no texts between RH and LH that day.x
So another poster is listening to the hearing and saying it was not a text. Was it something else like IM...or is Stoddard inconsistent on that? Anyone?
http://careers.davita.com/careers/clinical-team/dietitianMy hubby has a kidney transplant. He went to a Dialysis for a year before his transplant he said he will do hemodialysis the next time around, at home. With that said, I wondered if she did home visits to hemodialysis patients.
http://careers.davita.com/careers/nursing/home-hemodialysis
He says somewhere else that there were no texts between them? Because that's not what that says. That says he got no texts from her. Two really different things to my mind. Sorry to be a PITA. I'm not picking an argument with you. Just trying to figure out exactly what they said they have. :seeya:
Wondering if there is one thing in particular that is a "smoking gun"? Or will this case be made up of a number of circumstances/circumstantial pieces of evidence? Also wondering if people think the state has enough already to win a conviction; that part I am not so sure of. As of now, if people (jurors?) want to be believe he is just a nasty man who did a stupid thing, they can probably convince themselves of that. Wondering what the consensus is.
So another poster is listening to the hearing and saying it was not a text. Was it something else like IM...or is Stoddard inconsistent on that? Anyone?
It wasn't a text per se~~they had something called kick phone(?) Something along that line and IIRC only IMs
Probably answered already but Stoddard said it was probably another chat application like Google chat, Kik or whatever and he had not seen that communication yet.
they used kik. Did you hear Stoddard specifically say that the message we're talking about was kik, or text or something else, or was he vague about it?