General theory thread and motives rehashed #3

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
As most of you know, Crystal was not present for this hearing because she wasn’t even aware of it being scheduled.

Why wasn’t she aware? Because the address given to the court for Crystal by Ronald Cummings was, in fact, the address of a process server and NOT CRYSTAL SHEFFIELD!
 

Attachments

  • RCProcessServer.jpg
    RCProcessServer.jpg
    73.4 KB · Views: 23
It is interesting how precise Ron's wording is when he describes Crystal living a life filled with drugs, having drugs around the kids, living with a drug addict, etc.

Given what we now know about Ronald Cummings, it is clear that Ron simply outlined his own lifestyle in that paragraph of the petition and transposed it onto Crystal.
 
Papa, do you know if the judge in question is still a sitting judge?
 
I wonder if there is a way to post these documents in the online photo albums--alongside all those photos that were posted as an attempt to show Ron as Super-Dad.

Just sayin...
 
The ruling issued by R. Mitchell Prugh after this one sided hearing was disastrous and difficult to undo for Crystal and her custody of the children.

The only testimony given was by a father who was out on bond for multiple, serious, drug charges. His allegations regarding Crystal were accepted by the Magistrate without corroboration of any sort.

This is the ruling from R Mitchell Prugh for what I consider to be travesty number one from his court.

Part A:
 

Attachments

  • RCCustodyRuling1.jpg
    RCCustodyRuling1.jpg
    56.2 KB · Views: 29
  • RCCustodyRuling2.jpg
    RCCustodyRuling2.jpg
    59.6 KB · Views: 26
  • RCCustodyRuling3.jpg
    RCCustodyRuling3.jpg
    65 KB · Views: 26
Magistrate's Ruling Part B:
 

Attachments

  • RCCustodyRuling4.jpg
    RCCustodyRuling4.jpg
    61.9 KB · Views: 15
  • RCCustodyRuling5.jpg
    RCCustodyRuling5.jpg
    56.6 KB · Views: 11
  • RCCustodyRuling6.jpg
    RCCustodyRuling6.jpg
    26.2 KB · Views: 9
This goes out to Levi:

How about doing a radio show on these documents? This information really needs to be out there and public knowledge. You do not need to respond to this post; I only ask that you consider this since you have been so determined to have the truth be known.

TIA.
 
OK, picking up where we left off, Crystal fired off a letter to the Honorable R. Mitchell Prugh the day after his ruling was recorded in Putnam County. I’m not completely sure of how she actually found out about this travesty, but find out she certainly did.

To anyone who says Crystal Sheffield didn’t fight for her children, please read this letter.
 

Attachments

  • RCCrystalRehearingLetter.jpg
    RCCrystalRehearingLetter.jpg
    141.5 KB · Views: 37
OK, picking up where we left off, Crystal fired off a letter to the Honorable R. Mitchell Prugh the day after his ruling was recorded in Putnam County. I’m not completely sure of how she actually found out about this travesty, but find out she certainly did.

To anyone who says Crystal Sheffield didn’t fight for her children, please read this letter.

Once again this case has me reduced to tears.
 
Concerned Papa you truly are HaLeigh's angel! Thank you from the very bottom of my heart for all the work you do to seek & expose the truth in this case. ((((BIG HUGS))))
 
As a direct result of Crystal’s letter, this Magistrate was forced to hold a rehearing on the custody of the children. He had no choice as his office had clearly sent the original hearing notice to the wrong address which was supplied by Ronald Cummings.

Unfortunately for Crystal, and more importantly for these children, the die was already cast as to this Magistrate’s ruling.

Despite Ronald Cummings prior arrest record, despite Ronald Cummings’ testimony of having taken a 6 month old baby and his sister to Mexico on “vacation”, despite Ronald Cummings being out on bond for a new batch of drug charges, this Magistrate saw fit to take these children away from their mother based SOLELY on what Ronald Cummings had to say with NO corroborating testimony or evidence of any sort!

It is my opinion that this ruling is R Mitchell Prugh’s SECOND travesty in the short life of Haleigh Cummings.

Part A:
 

Attachments

  • CustodyFinal1.jpg
    CustodyFinal1.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 24
  • CustodyFinal2.jpg
    CustodyFinal2.jpg
    72.4 KB · Views: 20
  • CustodyFinal3.jpg
    CustodyFinal3.jpg
    66.7 KB · Views: 31
  • CustodyFinal4.jpg
    CustodyFinal4.jpg
    68 KB · Views: 24
Magistrate's Second Ruling Part B:
 

Attachments

  • CustodyFinal5.jpg
    CustodyFinal5.jpg
    62.3 KB · Views: 14
  • CustodyFinal6.jpg
    CustodyFinal6.jpg
    63.8 KB · Views: 12
  • CustodyFinal7.jpg
    CustodyFinal7.jpg
    65.7 KB · Views: 15
  • CustodyFinal8.jpg
    CustodyFinal8.jpg
    67 KB · Views: 14
Magistrate's Second Ruling Part C:
 

Attachments

  • CustodyFinal9.jpg
    CustodyFinal9.jpg
    70.9 KB · Views: 16
  • CustodyFinal9A.jpg
    CustodyFinal9A.jpg
    68.9 KB · Views: 18
  • CustodyFinal9B.jpg
    CustodyFinal9B.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 16
  • CustodyFinal9C.jpg
    CustodyFinal9C.jpg
    58.3 KB · Views: 12
She probably wouldn't do it, if it shows RC in a bad light. She may even have those angels on in a boxing ring...:innocent:

I think you are right, NG wouldn't dare cover this judge because it would show that Ron shouldn't have had the children. I was being facetious when I posted (tongue in cheek) that we should send this to NG. I think that she would most likely throw it in the trash can.
 
This is as far as I'm going with this for now. Out of the hundreds of pages of public records that I obtained, the one's I have posted paint a clear picture of exactly how and why Haleigh Cummings was living with her father and his 17 year old babysitter/girlfriend on February 9, 2009.

It is my opinion that she should have never been placed in that environment to live out the remainder of her short, tragic life.

In my first post tonight, I asked you to please read and remember, particularly, Section II paragraph 3 on the second page of Ronald's petition for custody. I can only wonder if the Honorable R. Mitchell Prugh still agrees with the words contained in the last sentence,

"Children seem to be much healthier and happier now."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RDtrTwvY0Y
 
After reading these court documents I'm so angry I could burst. Florida Courts have definitely failed both of these children. It is even more amazing that after Haleigh disappeared DCF once again decided that Ronald Cummings was father of the year! Truly mind blowing.

I knew that I had read somewhere that the children were on Medicaid, it was on these documents. So much for Ronald being able to provide health insurance. If the children qualified for Medicaid, then Ron was also receiving a monthly check and most likely EBT/Food stamps as well. That is probably why he made sure he never worked for very long at any one place, ie., he would lose these benefits. Now, he is still living off of the state.:maddening:
 
Just proves how vindictive RC and TN are. TN helped RC fill out the statement. They used an address they knew without a doubt it was not Crystal's. I am no lawyer but how is that not fraud? But, of course they weren't even considering the children's feelings in not being able to see their mother. This is too infuriating.
 
OK, picking up where we left off, Crystal fired off a letter to the Honorable R. Mitchell Prugh the day after his ruling was recorded in Putnam County. I’m not completely sure of how she actually found out about this travesty, but find out she certainly did.

To anyone who says Crystal Sheffield didn’t fight for her children, please read this letter.

:furious: It's time for a drink.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
274
Total visitors
381

Forum statistics

Threads
609,686
Messages
18,256,761
Members
234,723
Latest member
Pamadeus
Back
Top