I came into this trial thinking manslaughter. I didn't know any of the things in your second paragraph, because I refused to read or listen to it. I have only watched actual testimoney, and no TH about this case, and now my opinion is GZ is innocent.
I'm usually with the proscution in every case, but this is the least amount of evidence against a person I have ever seen. And this judge seems to not want to let anything in. Every other case, they let in stuff that I can't believe, about the victim and then nothing about the accused. PO's me everytime. But here it is the opposite.
I also wonder if for a lot of people, this is the first trial they have followed, and have a lot personally invested in it. They are not open to hearing the evidence, their opinion has already been formed. I went into Jodi A and Casey A that way, and the evidence only reinforced my beliefs.
Kathi Belich, WFTV @KBelichWFTV
I have never seen that in more than 30 years of court reporting. #Zimmermanon9
You should've seen West go off on her last night...
She turned her back to him, and left the courtroom while he was still barking at her...
She kept on asking GZ if he's going to testify when the defense hasn't formally ended their case yet.
I think this Judge just doesn't like Don West. He is the only one I have seen her really get annoyed with. Maybe there is some sort of history between the two on another case?
Yes we do. We know that he did not have them before the fight and had them after .HE did not do it to himself that leaves TM.
TM does not know the police are coming. GZ does. TM thinks he has all the time in the world to do what he wants.. GZ knows the police could be there right now. It does not stand to reason along with the information from RJ that GZ was going after TM at that point.
No. The state has to prove that he willfully with ill will went after TM and killed him. That is what Murder 2 is. Maybe if it was just manslaughter and willful disregard for human life, But with MURDER 2 that state has to prove that.
But it does matter. And it shows that he was on the phone with authorities. He was not taking it under his own power to do anything.
It is not a crime to ask the question but it is a crime to punch someone in the face. It is obvious that GZ got hit in the face. AT least once.
His injuries show he was under attack at some point.
Dang it! I missed it!
quoting myself...
HLN just replayed it. All I can say is, WOW!!
<mod snip> Words often do not have just one meaning: confront can also mean brought face to face with. That's exactly how I interpret that word in this report. Not going to put words in your mouth, please tell us how you interpret the word confront as it is used in the context of this report? TIA MOO
Wow! West is SO disrespectful!
Sent from my LG-VM696 using Tapatalk 2
IANAL, but even I know that a defendant has the right to wait until the very last minute (before the defense has concluded) to decide whether or not he/she chooses to testify.
IMO, this judge was completely out of line in demanding an answer at that moment.
If a verified attorney wishes to inform me otherwise, I welcome any information.
Having watched many trials, I've NEVER seen a judge do what Judge Nelson just did.
Yes we do. We know that he did not have them before the fight and had them after .HE did not do it to himself that leaves TM.
TM does not know the police are coming. GZ does. TM thinks he has all the time in the world to do what he wants.. GZ knows the police could be there right now. It does not stand to reason along with the information from RJ that GZ was going after TM at that point.