SilkySifaka
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Messages
- 2,933
- Reaction score
- 30
yes! mansllaughter is in
This prosecutor reminds me of Niles Crane.
Does anyone know if jurors are allowed to remain anonymous?
Unfair influence and/or intimidation? IDK....
What is this child abuse charge? Under 17 is a minor, certainly not a child!
Everyone is entitled to a "defense". Did you think he would just walk into jail? Most do not. Self- defense was the only defense he had any chance of asserting.
This entire thing is making me sick. The State/prosecutor asked for Murder2. Now, since they see they aren't going to get it, they are (IMO) going to be allowed to stick in a few more charges to be SURE GZ gets jail time.
IMO, this judge will allow those charges in, and IMO that stinks. M2, or nothing.
"Imo, the GZ trial has reflected an impotent attempt at persecution vs a prosecution"..
The George Zimmerman investigation was hijacked "in a number of ways" by outside forces, said the former police chief of Sanford, Florida.
Bill Lee, who testified Monday in Zimmerman's second-degree murder trial, told CNN's George Howell in an exclusive interview that he felt pressure from city officials to arrest Zimmerman to placate the public rather than as a matter of justice.
"It was (relayed) to me that they just wanted an arrest. They didn't care if it got dismissed later," he said. "You don't do that."
When Sanford police arrived on the scene on February 26, 2012, after Zimmerman fatally shot unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, they conducted a "sound" investigation, and the evidence provided no probable cause to arrest Zimmerman at the scene, he said.
It had nothing to do with Florida's controversial "Stand Your Ground" law, he said; from an investigative standpoint, it was purely a matter of self-defense.
Unfair influence and/or intimidation? IDK....
What is this child abuse charge? Under 17 is a minor, certainly not a child!
More carp against the wall - something has to stick, doesn't it? After all an innocent young man is dead - someone has to pay to appease part of the community, don't they?
NO, says I.
My opinion only
I honestly don't know the answer to that. But the media and the gallery, etc. has been sitting there looking at them for a few weeks now. What are the chances that their identities won't be published even if they might be entitled to anonymity as a technical matter. I would say about nil. jmo
I'm having a lot of trouble with suddenly shoving in a bunch of charge options at the end. It doesn't seem fair.
Manslaughter being in is significant. I think there could be a slim chance of a conviction for that although they explained to this point what constitutes that. Will that be in the jury instructions?
Child Abuse??
REally...well, I wasn't expecting that.
I'm waiting for jaywalking.
I'm having a lot of trouble with suddenly shoving in a bunch of charge options at the end. It doesn't seem fair.
Manslaughter being in is significant. I think there could be a slim chance of a conviction for that although they explained to this point what constitutes that. Will that be in the jury instructions?
Must have missed it but WAT tweeted that Judge Nelson allowed manslaughter to be option for jury?