ShadyLady
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2013
- Messages
- 3,706
- Reaction score
- 5,116
imo, that was 1000% fabrication to cover for the fact that Trayvon is the only one of the two that used a racial slur.
Good point. I trust Deedee NOT...IMO.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
imo, that was 1000% fabrication to cover for the fact that Trayvon is the only one of the two that used a racial slur.
There was a recording played in court and all over the news last night where GZ, in his own words, states he is going BACK to get Trayvon. :twocents:
Please link it...unless that is your opinion.
I wrote down her exact words last night. She said ALMOST by his Daddy's fiance's house when being questioned by Bernie, right before her testimony of GET OFF. JMO
What it comes down to is the state has to prove that Zimmerman attacked Martin. Not followed him. Not profiled him. Not wannabe copped him or whatever. Not that the situation could have been avoided if he dd not exit his car. The state has to prove that Zimmerman attacked. Initiated violence. And I can't see where they came anywhere near that.
I agree. I find this very distasteful.
As someone pointed out, in ever other forum I have read at this site, the victim is treated with dignity. This one, the victim and his family have been consistently disparaged and worse.
I got a root canal. Now you believe me? IMO
That was a pretty effective closing.
IMO this is the weakest argument yet.
imo, that was 1000% fabrication to cover for the fact that Trayvon is the only one of the two that used a racial slur.
I would not take a firearm outside my house either but I can't imagine not coming to the aid of a neighbor if I heard them screaming. It has always bothered me that not one of his neighbors came to aid GZ.
MOM did not talk about lesser charges??
That was a pretty effective closing.
Thank you. This is what troubles me the most, I'm very disappointed that TM, the victim, has not only suffered from a lack of sympathy, he had been made out to be a malicious attacker when there's NO EVIDENCE he had even hit GZ. IMO.
GZ had some MINOR injuries, period. TM had *ZERO* DNA of GZ on him, showing that he didn't punch, slam or tussle with GZ. Yet most insist that the lack of this CRUCIAL evidence means *NOTHING* and continue to state as a FACT that TM slammed and punched GZ. IMO.
Finally, it isn't enough for self-defense if a fight or an attack takes place. The defense *MUST* prove *REASONABLE FEAR* for one's life. GZ's tiny injuries will not lead any reasonable person to believe that GZ would have died or sustained great bodily harm *IMMINENTLY* when he shot to kill TM.
These words are very important - *REASONABLE* FEAR FOR *IMMINENT* DEATH/GREAT BODILY HARM.
It is not enough that you're being attacked in some manner as fights happen all the time, every minute, everywhere in the world. If the fears are not reasonable, if great bodily harm is not imminent, then there's no basis for KILLING another person citing "self-defense". IMO
GZ had every right to fight, as did TM, but did he have the right to kill?
:twocents:MOO
And if it is just an innocent person walking home from the store to his home - then what?:moo: IMO
And yet best supports none of GZ's DNA on or injuries to Trayvon's hands.
Fancy that.