Seriously disagree
In Reply
1. Mr. Martin may not have heard the recording properly, he may have been too upset, OR like Zimmerman, decided differently later on.
2. That's before all the evidence came out.
3. Those are unreliable and not permitted as evidence.
4. Goodman's tale is not neccessarily accurate and doesn't fit the testimony of other witnesses who were there and were neighbors.
5. Rachel's testimony didnt' change nearly as often as that of some others and I think she is correct about the location at that time.
6. Most of them said they couldn't see hardly at all in the drizzle and dark. But the light near Salma Mora's home was reportedly better and she saw GZ on top just before the shot.
7. I agree that Zimmerman had no MMA fighting injuries because he is the one who was trained in MMA fighting. Google it
8. Grass stains have no time limitations AFAIK
9. That would be in direct conflict of what Zimmerman related.
10. Pure unestablished conjecture.
11. Ahh, a factoid among the assortment of WAGS Which has no true bearing on the case
12. Because he had a gun, in this case.
The trial was probably brought about because the Florida Powers That Be were made to realize they weren't going to get away with sweeping this killing under the carpet like so much unwanted dirt. However I do not see the Prosecution doing anything other than going through the motions to appease most Americans who aren't racially biased. IMO
All In My Opinion.
*mod snip* I don't have a dog in this fight, I look at evidence.
1. Completely wrong and conjecture on your part, Martins dad was vehement that it was NOT his son screaming when he heard the tapes. Then changed his mind when the lawyers got involved.
2. Before the evidence came out? Wrong again, this was in a interview long after the evidence was out.
3. Voice stress analysis is not admitted to court like polygraphs, but they are a strong police tool and good proof. There is no hesitation or thinking about things, he spit the answers out as soon as the question was asked, my experience is that is a truth teller.
4. Goodman's tale is not accurate in what way? Because you don't like it? He has been the best eyewitness so far. It does fit because as i explained before, Zimmerman was on top AFTER the shot telling him not to move and spreading his arms. That's what the other girls saw, after the shot, not before the shot.
5. BS--Her testimony changed when she added 'get off, get off' which is different than he original statement. However, I am not talking about that.You are agreeing with me she made it all the way down to his house (that's her testimony, not mine), so he had to come back to the T-intersection.
6. Selene saw someone running left to right. That had to be from Trayvon's house where Rachel said he was--all the way back to the T-intersection. Why didn't he walk in his house? Because he ran back to the T.
7. You are confused, I said Zimmerman had significant fighting injuries and Trayvon had none. Zimmerman was interested in it but went to a gym to lose weight.
8. Evidence of those grass stains were taken into custody that night. I doubt Zimmerman is going to walk around with grass stains for several days, or Trayon is going to walk around with grass stain pants for several days.
9. Wrong, that is exactly what GZ said, it started near the grass, went to concrete and he was trying to move his head onto the grass.
10. No not conjecture but supported based on timing. Zimmerman was on the bottom when he shot based on shirt analysis. Zimmerman did not get on top until after the shot.
11. No bearing that Trayvon was a 6-foot hs football player who carried his dad out a building? Very important because some of the public thinks he was a little kid based on pictures released, and jurors have to know he was physically able to do that.
12. Wrong, no one is going to start a physical fight and take a substantial beating first when he is out of breath. He would have pulled out the gun first. No one is going to call the cops and have him meet them there either.
You may seriously disagree, but you have no serious evidence to back you up. I also know people are emotionally invested in this case, but Zimmerman is innocent. Forensics and other evidence back him up.