Post 517 on TuesdayIs there a link to this ?
You were the first to reply to it .
Last edited:
Post 517 on TuesdayIs there a link to this ?
So it's not known if they actually testified then.Post 517 on Tuesday
You were the first to reply to it .
Thamk you, I've just re-read that.Post 517 on Tuesday
You were the first to reply to it .
There's nothing like a bit of impartial journalism, and this is certainly nothing like a piece of impartial journalism.JC doesn't like FF, shock horror, FF drives a ferrari, so do Sainz and leclerc.
ANALYSIS: How a brave Irish rape victim ran rings around Christian Brueckner’s team of expensive lawyers - and got the Olive Press a mention in the process - Olive Press News Spain
By Jon Clarke in Braunschweig, Germany IT was the day that Madeleine McCann suspect Christian Brueckner's slick defence backfired. And it partly hingedwww.theolivepress.es
Is it also morally acceptable for the olive to be showing it, what's the purpose ? who cares, it probably happens all the time, I like how it's said it's not illegal then the author say HCW doesn't know if FF could be prosecuted over it.The mail FF wrote allegedly to Hazel is in the article, so not really nothing. IMO morally unacceptable
It is an impossibility to follow what is going on in the court either as it develops or even in retrospect. My opinionThanks! Maybe they will be up this coming week - or still Hazel?
Because of the Olive Press paywall I'm at a loss re. the mail written by FF re. HB. Is it possible for you to indicate what it concerned.the mail was read out in court so everyone heard it. It wasn’t given to the judge with no words.
I don’t know if the Finnish women joined. It was mentioned there are witnesses from Spain, Portugal, Finnland and they were mentioned in the Bild article.
So - in updating my notes - we have heard evidence for the following cases - right?
Count 1 - Hazel - ongoing. Do not know if she is finished as there are hearings on 5/21, 5/22 & 5/23 coming up..
Count 2 - 14 year old teenager (unknown victim/on tape) - heard evidence
Count 3 - elderly 70-80 - heard evidence.
Count 4 - 10 year old German girl (Joana E.) - I do NOT think we have heard this case yet??
Count 5 - 11 year Portugeuese irl (Ines VP) - heard evidence.
There is not much more to go - so wondering WHY they are going all the way into October?
Will Hazel be on the stand thru June & August?? Seems a bit long to me. Can not be much testimony for the 10 year German girl's case...
There is only one date listed in July, which is the 5th, nothing then until early august.Kindly posted by Niner.I have a feeling German courts break for the summer. Sometime in July to late Aug?
Just an FYI - Upcoming trial dates:
Trial dates: April 3, 5, 10, 12, 17, 19, 24, 25, May 2, 3, 8, 15, 16, 17, 21, 22, 23, 28, 29, June 4, 5, 6, 25, 26, July 5, August 5, 15, 16, Sept. 5, 26, 27, Oct. 2, 7, 8, 21 & Oct. 22, 2024. (Expected to last up to 8 months, it was 3 months).
It's not paywalled.Because of the Olive Press paywall I'm at a loss re. the mail written by FF re. HB. Is it possible for you to indicate what it concerned.
I thought one of the advantages of the inquisitorial process was that there would be no surprises in open court.
There is only one date listed in July, which is the 5th, nothing then until early august.Kindly posted by Niner.
Strange I clicked on the link and it opened.Paywalled for me .
Paywalled for me .
Strange I clicked on the link and it opened.
It is a great pity that so many MSM publications have found it necessary to make ends meet by going behind a paywall.Trust me, you're not missing anything. The headline alone -
"How a brave Irish rape victim ran rings around Christian Brueckner’s team of expensive lawyers - and got the Olive Press a mention in the process"
- should tell you that you are not at a disadvantage here. It is nothing but self-congratulatory, subjective, sensation-driven bullsh*it from a man who cares only about bigging himself up and clicks and revenue for his tawdry site.
I find it a little depressing, here in 2024, that JC continues to be linked to and quoted on here, as if, despite everything known to the contrary about him as far as his motivation goes, people still believe he's a reliable narrator? And eventually will turn into someone whose 'mission' has MM, as opposed to himself and his own agenda, at its core?
Come on.
Yes,I cannot see how anyone can take JC seriously. He doesn't have an objective bone in his body. IMOTrust me, you're not missing anything. The headline alone -
"How a brave Irish rape victim ran rings around Christian Brueckner’s team of expensive lawyers - and got the Olive Press a mention in the process"
- should tell you that you are not at a disadvantage here. It is nothing but self-congratulatory, subjective, sensation-driven bullsh*it from a man who cares only about bigging himself up and clicks and revenue for his tawdry site.
I find it a little depressing, here in 2024, that JC continues to be linked to and quoted on here, as if, despite everything known to the contrary about him as far as his motivation goes, people still believe he's a reliable narrator? And eventually will turn into someone whose 'mission' has MM, as opposed to himself and his own agenda, at its core?
Come on.