Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not a great deal really, he expressed sympathy and was interested in the alleged mark on CB, could she describe it in detail, would she be willing to share details of the investigation , would she be willing to speak to him in Confidentiality. FF wants the right man convicted he says its not his client .The e mail was not a photo copy but JCs version of it with no date stamp.what did FFs message say?
Sent via pm.what did FFs message say?
what did FFs message say?
I think that until it's proven CB was the person who raped HaB then she is treated as a witness. As such, the defence can approach her but she does have the right to decline to assist them (the defence). It's not illegal but not the norm. I think FF has trodden on a fine line between witness intimidation and a need for help for his client.Looked like it was written by a 9 year old , very unprofessional and quite possibly illegal .
Is it known whether it was sent prior to or after the charges were laid.I think that until it's proven CB was the person who raped HaB then she is treated as a witness. As such, the defence can approach her but she does have the right to decline to assist them (the defence). It's not illegal but not the norm. I think FF has trodden on a fine line between witness intimidation and a need for help for his client.
It was sent in August 2020 according to OP article, citing HaB's lawyer Gabriella Rieke, so well before charges were laid.Is it known whether it was sent prior to or after the charges were laid.
I think that until it's proven CB was the person who raped HaB then she is treated as a witness. As such, the defence can approach her but she does have the right to decline to assist them (the defence). It's not illegal but not the norm. I think FF has trodden on a fine line between witness intimidation and a need for help for his client.
He asked for the investigation files. Quite different from her account that was in the public domain.I'm not sure I agree with that. She wasn't a witness when he corresponded with her. It would have been out of order had he approached her after the rape charge had been made against CB but prior to that, I don't think it's a big deal. It wasn't as if he was threatening her or making demands on her, merely asking for clarity re the account of her attack that she herself had put in the public domain.
He asked for the investigation files. Quite different from her account that was in the public domain.
Were they even her's to give ?He asked for the investigation files. Quite different from her account that was in the public domain.
The article doesn't mention that the VW camper was at the Dragon Festival-Orgiva,Spain, which ran from 16-19 March 2007EXCLUSIVE: As the trial of Maddie suspect Christian Brueckner re-starts - and she would have been 21 this month - JON CLARKE traces his suspicious movements through Spain and Portugal in May 2007 - Olive Press News Spain
MADELEINE McCann suspect Christian Brueckner stayed in at least half a dozen places around the Algarve and Spain in the month before the British toddlerwww.theolivepress.es
An attempted abduction of a 4 year old with her family leaving the beach (Luz?) by a man on a motorcycle just one week before Madeleine disappeared. Another incident it would appear local police deemed unimportant and irrelevant.
Could you please PM me the article?I take it no one proof reads the article before it's printed, and he wants to be taken seriously ?
Finally, it’s known he was on the move inland on the night of April 3 when Maddie vanished.