Elainera
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2012
- Messages
- 12,276
- Reaction score
- 20,739
I wonder if her phone or his phone was on record or on video and it was heard or seen.
I don't understand. What do you mean?
I wonder if her phone or his phone was on record or on video and it was heard or seen.
In another case here on Websleuths a teen age girl in Tennessee put her phone on video and recorded her step father committing SA on her. The step father was arrested based on that evidence and is in jail awaiting trial.I don't understand. What do you mean?
Happy that she is back safe!Some good news! The other 15 year old German girl from Verden has been found. She was missing since Feb 12 and was staying with the family of a friend.
Gives hope doesn't it?
If LE has such irrefutable evidence from that morning that they could say she never left the home alive and could arrest the BIL twice, why can't they proceed without a body? Is that necessary under German law, to have a body?
Good point about LE finding traces of fluids such as urine and/or vomit...I was wondering whether they found bodily fluids (urine, vomit ...) other than blood in unusual places? Cleaned up and unnoticeable but made visible by the forensic technicians.
As for cadaver dogs not alerting, as far as I know we only heard they didn't alert at the car. I don't remember reading anything about the house and cadaver dogs. The other thing to keep in mind is they are not 100% reliable, they are not machines, they can miss things. So the fact that they didn't alert at the car doesn't mean R wasn't in there.
Jmo.
Good News!Some good news! The other 15 year old German girl from Verden has been found. She was missing since Feb 12 and was staying with the family of a friend.
Gives hope doesn't it?
Thank you @Elainera for your daily updates and translations. In any of the articles does the LE ever discuss any other directions they are looking? Or is the BIL and his disposing of her body they only approach they are taking? Do they think the family is just being unrealistic in their statements that she is being held somewhere?
I have not heard LE speak about the family much. Once when the family publicly criticised LE's approach they said these public interviews are not helping the investigation, or words to that effect.
As for other directions, they said kind of in general that yes, if they get/find other leads they will of course follow up on them but they made it clear that their main approach and main focus is that Rebecca died in the house and the BIL is their main (and seemingly only) suspect which they continue to investigate.
Now Rebecca's mother said in the interview: "If we don't make it public who will look for the child?"
The relationship between LE and the family feels very icy at the moment. imo
I am still hung up on what does LE have that they are certain that she never left the house alive !
I agree with your assessment. It may be a premature comment, made in the heat of the moment that they cannot or choose not to walk back. I hope it is not leading them to pursue a direction that the facts aren't entirely supporting but that they cannot or will not move away from.Everybody is. It's an unusual statement to make so early in an investigation and without a body.
My opinion is that it is not 100% because of what FR's lawyer said ("searching for a body that might not even exist").
I really want to know this, too. They seem extremely convinced that she is no longer alive. Why? How? I don’t expect that this “evidence” will be released to the public anytime soon, though. Sigh ...I am still hung up on what does LE have that they are certain that she never left the house alive ! What did LE find in the home so early on that they seem to be pursuing only the BIL.
They are expending an enormous of money and man power and time on these searches of lakes and forests, based on what evidence.
There are no answers for motive, why would BIL do this to someone he was reportedly close to?