Leannes story seems credible and paints a picture of events that happen in Oak Beach that are consistent with what Shannan may have experienced. Yes, we should be appalled by LEs participation in those events. But thats as far as Ray should have taken it. IMO
Far is a relative description found yards away, not so much. Rays manipulation of information to fit his version of events should be a big red flag for all of us who know the facts about Shannans case better than the general public. Id love to call a press conference and name names and then cite my instincts as the source of my assertions and link events in the most optimal way to enhance my case but there are laws against this! Ray has a professional duty. Leannes statement, although enlightening, was not proof.
Im not trying to play devils advocate for no reason, Nin, I respect your views. And the fact is the info that came out yesterday benefited my research in that it geographically placed my POI very close to Burke's playtime activities. As Ive said in other posts high-powered men dont clean up their own messes. There is a hierarchy. I do think Burke's is involved, but I disagree with Rays low-standard MO. He is steering public thinking away from other plausible suspects because hes so myopically focused on Hackett. How fair is that to Shannan?