Re post of info, possibly relevant to the RH case going forward. imo.Have we ever had a family of an accused hire an attorney and go after LE for destruction of their personal property during searches? JMO - seems this may be where it's headed.
Taxpayers pick up cost of damage to Williams' home
Ontario taxpayers footed the bill to repair the floors of convicted sex killer Col. Russell Williams' Ottawa home after police searched it for evidence.
www.ctvnews.ca
An Ontario Provincial Police spokeswoman says if there's damage after police search a home, an owner can seek compensation.
Sgt. Kristine Rae says such a request was made for the Williams residence, and it was granted.''
''The brother of one of Williams' murder victims, Andy Lloyd, called it ridiculous that police paid "$3,000 to fix her hardwood floors and apparently $1,400 to fix a lamp because the OPP damaged them dragging boxes of bras out of her house."
During a videotaped police interrogation, which was shown in court this week, Williams became teary-eyed as he desperately tried to protect his wife's home from a destructive police search.''
NOTING fwiw..
![macleans.ca](/forums/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.macleans.ca%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F02%2FRussell-Williams-and-wife-Mary-Elizabeth-Harriman.jpg&hash=a4b241692d2ae38d20958b2927a7f792&return_error=1)
Wife of serial killer Russell Williams loses court battle
Mary Elizabeth Harriman could be forced to testify against Williams for first time
![macleans.ca](/forums/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fmacleans.ca%2Fandroid-chrome-192x192.png&hash=7927786417c64c38b5e265e220d3d483&return_error=1)
Two other multi-million-dollar lawsuits—one filed by “Jane Doe,” Williams’s first sexual assault victim; the other by the family of Jessica Lloyd, who was abducted from her Belleville home and strangled inside the cottage—contain identical allegations: that the post-arrest land transfer, “clearly suspicious” and carried out in “secret,” should be reversed. (As Maclean’s reported last May, Williams has since sold the cottage for $165,000, with the proceeds being held in trust pending the outcome of each lawsuit.)
In court documents, Harriman denies the property transfer was fraudulent, saying she had “absolutely no intention whatsoever” of shielding assets and that the deal was signed solely to ensure her “financial security.”