Patrick Jane
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2019
- Messages
- 465
- Reaction score
- 5,441
Has there been anymore said about that reconstruction Patrick? Other journalists must have queried the obvious things like his shoes and Caroline unrestrained?
The fingernails are a real mystery, her hands must have been held or tied while she was suffocated, even if she was sound asleep she’d have woken up and at least managed to scratch surely and regardless who the murderer is you’d think there would be some trace of them, even B wouldn’t be able to explain his skin under her nails.
The tape is equally weird, same story, whether it’s truly a vicious gang or someone closer to home it’s still nearly impossible to use tape with gloves on and without them you’d never avoid leaving at least a partial print or 2.
I don’t buy robbers in PPE at all, or them doing a forensic clean up afterwards, I think if you’ve got shaved hair and gloves it’s quite possibly to not leave traces, but not when there’s a physical assault.
It seems certain that LE are withholding certain information from the public. So we have limited details. LE tells us information that LE wants us to know, and then there are occasionally leaks to the press.
If the victim was suffocated while face down on top of something, say a pillow, would there have been DNA evidence on her nails? What if her arm was being held down? /speculation
As for the tape, it was reported in the Ta Nea report I posted yesterday that the husband's πελματικό εντύπωμα was found on the tape. This is a little hard to translate into English. But it means something like "an impression of the sole of his foot."
I wonder if LE has more info on the tape, that they haven't yet disclosed. JMO
The robbers in PPE/plastic coveralls doesn't make sense to me, because, based on the reporting, the husband hasn't described them as being dressed this way. So one could use his own statements to rule out this hypothetical explanation for the lack of DNA at the scene. MOO