Katie526
Former Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2008
- Messages
- 796
- Reaction score
- 0
I don't think we're allowed to do that!!!
It's true, so everyone should just stop.
I don't think we're allowed to do that!!!
When you hear G.A. saying that she says her name like "Antini" and not "Anthony"...he is speaking of our sighting. (Until that...it had not been released.) I have not spoke with G.A. ever...but....I did speak to his wife the night before when I first realized who she was.
I do agree with jbar about Terminals A and B...you might want to check the aiport about gate C5....I cannot explain that...but I do know that was the gate.
That's why I give no credence to the adoption story. What kind of people would let a person go to trial for murder when they could clear it up with just a mouth swab DNA?
Just curious, Trisha or another mod always contacts and verifies the identity of 'guest speakers' such as Dante, Exit, etc. Has this been done for this woman? If so I havent seem mention of it.
mitocondrial dna said so... Since Casey is alive, and the mitocondrial dna of the sample matched hers, and was from a corpse, then according to scientific deduction, it can only have been her child. Since she had only one child, then again, through reasonable deduction, it was Caylee, who was her only child...
Of course LE could track them down if they WANTED to, but doing this would not fit with their immediate conclusion that the child was dead. As for private investigators of any kind, hired by anyone, the airlines would not be required to provide the passenger lists to them and probably could not do so without a warrant of some kind.
Because on July 2, Caylee was just a cute little girl she talked to in an airport.
I didn't get the understanding that this thread, too, was limited to people who believe that Caylee is still alive. I think it also disrespectful to posters who don't just accept this at face value to imply there is something wrong with them. If some choose to believe this story without investigating it, so be it. I would like to know how someone flew out of a nonexistent terminal; what proof there is there was not an investigation; who was involved from LE, so that we can follow and confirm what is said here. Someone telling a story like this should expect strict scrutiny, as should her proponents.
TTT thank you for coming here and posting what you saw and heard. I know that there are a lot of poster that will come on this thread and try and trash what you have to say. Just keep the faith and hold your head up high.
Of course LE could track them down if they WANTED to, but doing this would not fit with their immediate conclusion that the child was dead. As for private investigators of any kind, hired by anyone, the airlines would not be required to provide the passenger lists to them and probably could not do so without a warrant of some kind.
Um, what is impolite about my post? And yes--I would like an answer to my post--the information TTT has supplied sounds suspiciously made up to me--almost every detail she uses can be culled from the images and reports we all have read about Caylee. Probably one of the things LE found to be completely unbelieveable...and don't make suggestions for me "to leave"--I have just as much right to express my thoughts as you do. I'm sorry if you find it "impolite" to make a reasonable observation of TTT's story.
The doll "mama" was found in the car. That has been stated and corroborated by LE and the family many times. You are correct. She could not have had it on the plane. It was found in the backseat.
Just curious, Trisha or another mod always contacts and verifies the identity of 'guest speakers' such as Dante, Exit, etc. Has this been done for this woman? If so I havent seen mention of it.
That is what I asked the detectives....basically....what if she was flown as a Lapbaby?
I was told that ALL children, whether lap children or not...must have ID ....
It was explained to me that IF that plane went down...they would have to have all names on that roster...(lapchild or not.)
I was not the lady at the counter that oked them to board...you may have to ask them.
How do we know that? And why on earth would LE consider her not credible?However, what you don't realize is that she provided all this information to LE before ANY of the pictures were posted, before George made that statement, before WS had thousands of pages of comments etc. Her report was made very early in this case, and has remained consistent throughout, even with all of the continuing additions of pictures, statements, and documents released.