I sincerely appreciate you pointing it out. I needed to know so I could stop misrepresenting it as being a fact. Frankly, that was a huge piece of evidence that I believed was most incriminating as far as proving he was inside the house.
My biggest concern is how the jury perceives Taylor's victim's assistance payments. We know more details re these monsters. The jury only asked for Taylor's testimony which leads me to the concern.
@TTF14 Thank you! I didn't go down that far! Now I am just hopping back on here, so I'm behind. I know there was one hair at the crime scene. But are they also talking about the ones they vacuumed from the car? Because that car had been rented by someone else after MS brought it back.
She would have had to take her shoes off going through airport security. She could have picked up the hair then, it could be anyone's.
As far as the jury - IDK. I think if that hair had existed, as I thought it did, I suspect we might already have a verdict. There is still a ton of evidence but more of it witness testimony and circumstantial.
@Oregonmama Me too, because she had already told LE what she knew before any money came up. But the defense is making it sound like it she is doing all this for the money! 4oo hundred a month is nothing. $50 a week will maybe just put a dent in her child support for JR's baby. She only gets that money until the trial is over. Not her fault the defense has drug this thing out for four years!
@beach, could it be Dr. Petrites? He did feel for a pulse.
