kaen
Trying to be a good human.
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2014
- Messages
- 6,732
- Reaction score
- 49,096
Prior testimony about a lie detector test, I think. A little hard to follow.
Objections were brought up, but not on record.
It was a confusing conversation, since some aspects of the wanting a mistrial was discussed in private and off the record.
I believe the judge has said that when that issue was brought up and they had a side bar, he suggested to the defense that ( "was not timely made, I gave you the opportunity to correct it but you chose not to. And, uh, that is your choice. Motion denied.") they had some opportunity to take care of this at the time but chose not to do so.
I think that the defense is trying to have it two ways --dismissed case, if possible, but a foundation for ineffective counsel if convicted based on lawyer not making an objection.
Last edited: