![www.dailymail.co.uk](/forums/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi.dailymail.co.uk%2F1s%2F2024%2F07%2F09%2F02%2F87094165-0-image-a-27_1720486835842.jpg&hash=5e13424f22b9da36d16f59d57abff834&return_error=1)
Alec Baldwin's New Mexico trial will have beefed up security
With Alec Baldwin 's trial over the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the Western Rust set to start on Tuesday, security will be beefed up.
I'm having real difficulty with the state's position that they want to show that as a producer, he didn't follow guidelines, and therefore, as an actor, Mr. Baldwin did all these things wrong resulting in the death of Halyna Hutchins because as a producer, he allowed this all to happen,' the judge said at the hearing.
The civil trial has already taken place and a settlement reached, approved by a judge. That's usually the way these tragic events that take place on movie sets are handled.IANAL but I believe Alec Baldwin’s role as a producer and his culpability as a result is a civil matter not criminal. I think it’s the right call by the judge to exclude that type of argument. It will confuse the issue. Morrissey wants to go at him with everything she can but he’s already being sued and paying millions for his culpability as a producer. She can get him as an A list actor and his arrogant recklessness. Judge was fair to both sides today. She was stern with everyone. She also said that they have to ask to approach for all objections. Based on the bad behavior (speaking objections) at the 1st half of the last trial my guess is her colleagues have advised Judge Marlowe she needs to lay down the law before this turns into a circus.
Based on what I saw today defense is well-behaved. They are not going to mess with this judge and can’t afford to be arrogant defending a celebrity. Morrissey on the other hand!! She’s a pistol! lol. She’s putting on a fantastic performance. I love watching her. I get giddy when she comes up to the lectern and she never disappoints. Haha! JMO
Will this trial be on Courttv with cameras in the courtroom?
But the FBI destroyed the gun, a Colt. 45, during testing, making it impossible to check for potential defects that could have led to a malfunction, the defense contends.![]()
Alec Baldwin 'Rust' trial: Experts reveal key misstep that could blow up actor's defense
Alec Baldwin is "extremely volatile" and could be a "liability" for his own defense if he takes the stand, a legal expert told Fox News Digital.www.foxnews.com
Interesting. I hope that prosecutors will present any evidence and information relating to the defendant’s possible criminal culpability and responsibility in court with evidence and witnesses under oath.That is AB's "Get Out of Jail" card. Now, he is just an actor, doing what he was told. May as well drop the trial, I don't see any liability here now for AB.
They're not streaming jury selection, but it's supposed to finish today.
Almost certainly. Is a jury ever shown when a trial is televised or streamed? If you are on a jury it's because you are legally compelled to be there so you don't have a choice. Seems reasonable that you should have the right not to be broadcast to that world.No, just the trial starting tomorrow I believe.
Wonder if there is legal reason to not record jury selection?
Anyone know? Privacy issues?
Alec Baldwin's defense
Baldwin will bring with him an elite legal team of mostly New York-based attorneys, many of them Harvard Law graduates, from the firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. Alex Spiro, a 41-year-old defense attorney who has represented Elon Musk, Megan Thee Stallion and other prominent figures and has become among the most sought-after lawyers in the country, will give aggressive cross-examination to the state's witnesses.
The defense will try to show that it is not the job of an actor to make sure real rounds are not in his gun, a position strongly supported by Baldwin's union, the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists.
The prosecution team
Santa Fe County District Attorney Mary Carmack-Altwies appointed Kari Morrissey as a special prosecutor in the Baldwin case in early 2023 after her predecessor stepped down because of conflicts of interest. Morrissey promptly had the indictment against Baldwin dismissed, but revived it in January of this year by grand jury. Both moves came from further examination of the evidence, she said.
Morrissey graduated from the University of New Mexico and its law school and practiced law in Albuquerque for more than 20 years. New Mexico criminal defense attorney Erlinda Johnson joined Morrissey's team in April
![]()
Alec Baldwin about to go on trial in the death of "Rust" cinematographer. Here are key things to know.
Alec Baldwin is charged with felony involuntary manslaughter in the Oct. 21, 2021, shooting death of Halyna Hutchins.www.cbsnews.com
As far as I can see from the facts we already know, those charges perfectly accord with what he did.From article:
What charge does Alec Baldwin face?
The actor entered a New Mexico courtroom for the first time since the Oct. 21, 2021, shooting. He is charged with felony involuntary manslaughter. If a jury unanimously convicts him, he could get 18 months in prison.
...
What jurors must decide
Prosecutors have two alternative standards for proving the charge. One is based on the negligent use of a firearm. The other is proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Baldwin acted with total disregard or indifference for the safety of others.
Despite the legal and technical complexities of the case, the 12 citizens of Santa Fe County that will make up the jury will have to reach just one verdict — guilty or not guilty — on a single count.
As far as I can see from the facts we already know, those charges perfectly accord with what he did.
The simple fact is that he did not check the gun at all nor did he have a competent person (the armourer) demonstrate to him that it was safe to do what he was going to with it. That is definitely negligent.
The way I understand it, the negligent part of it has to stem from an unlawful act and the second part, which is defined as "without due caution or circumspection", must flow from a lawful act.
I'm not sure that they can show that what he was doing was actually unlawful but perhaps they can.
However, I think it's certainly the case that they can show the second part because there seems to be plenty of evidence that he behaved with no degree of caution or circumspection (which means to consider what your actions might lead to) whatsoever to what his actions may result in. He did not know - or have a reasonable belief due to checking it or having someone else check it - that that pistol was safe to be doing what he was doing with it.
Any reasonable person knows that ...if I point this firearm at someone and it discharges there is a high likelihood of death resulting..., yet he made absolutely zero effort to caution himself or to reflect on that before he did what he did with it. That, imo, perfectly makes out the charge of involuntary manslaughter according to the NM statute. I don't really see how he is going to argue against that, tbh.
"beyond a reasonable doubt that Baldwin acted with total disregard or indifference for the safety of others"