eddeva
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2008
- Messages
- 1,378
- Reaction score
- 4
True. But the jury is free to consider all options.
*resp. snipped.
you're quite right, they are, but if the subject of an accident isn't actually put forward by the defence at trial, can they consider it?
i'm asking b/c i'm not sure how the judicial system works in the US. i know that basically it's the same and in my country you can't deliberate things you make up yourself. you have to stay w/ what's been given to you for your consideration.
personally, i think sticking w/ the nanny story is the best proof of insanity for both casey and jose but what if they actually do that? i keep hearing that's the way they're going and i'm sure it'll have a brand new spin when we finally see it, but can a jury in America ignore the evidence presented and make up a story themselves then find someone not guilty based on what would be a complete fiction of their own creation and w/o any evidence of any kind shown at trial, what so ever?
i'm not being argumentative - this has been bothering me for a couple of weeks, wudge.