MyTinkieGirl
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
- Messages
- 1,675
- Reaction score
- 1,303
I'm wondering...when CM was giving his part of the closing arguments...and I'm sure it's totally OK for the defense to do this type of presentation....but, I can't help but think THAT had a lot to do with the jurys decision. IMO, I STILL for the life of me can't understand why it would be allowed for EITHER side to give their "version" of how to interpret the evidence as it applies to the charges.
As I was watching...it seemed to me, he was oversimplifying and obviously skewed toward the defense.
And, even though the judge gave the jury the "real" instructions, I can't help but think they weren't REALLY listening to HIS directions since CM's were explained so simplistically and the judges voice sounded like blah blah blah in their ears.
Just IMO...no sour grapes...just a TON of disbelief and questions in the deliberation process used in coming to the verdict.
As I was watching...it seemed to me, he was oversimplifying and obviously skewed toward the defense.
And, even though the judge gave the jury the "real" instructions, I can't help but think they weren't REALLY listening to HIS directions since CM's were explained so simplistically and the judges voice sounded like blah blah blah in their ears.
Just IMO...no sour grapes...just a TON of disbelief and questions in the deliberation process used in coming to the verdict.