I don't see how.
While the remains site lies N of the Bobo house, there is no evidence to conclude that she was taken to that site directly from being abducted. In fact, I'd wager the vast majority of theories say she was elsewhere, and alive, for some period of time. Some even seem to think her dead body was discarded one place first, then another.
If any of that is the working hypothesis, then the EVENTUAL site of body disposal can tell us absolutely nothing about the route taken on the day of abduction.
By the way, I'm not arguing that she wasn't taken in a northerly direction that day. Maybe she was. Maybe she wasn't. All I saying is, if that's what we wanna know, this ultimate location for Holly doesn't really give us any help in figuring it out.
My opinions only, no facts here:
Good Buddy,
While I agree with you in principle, if not in fact, my previous post above (#702) describes how to tell if the remains were originally buried and then removed (this is something I know about). But the overall flavor of your post retreats to "all things remain possible". I disagree. I believe we have enough combined evidence now to start forming specific hypotheses, and all things are not possible anymore.
To show that an argument is invalid, one must provide an equally convincing counterexample, not simply imply that such a counterexample exists. Oddly, I see this reasoning a lot: since all possibilities exist, all singular possibilities posted on the internet are invalid. I have tried to identify this form of reasoning, it might be argumentum e silentio. That is to say "where the conclusion is based on the absence of evidence [your logic], rather than the existence of evidence [my logic]" (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies).
In the "Many Worlds hypothesis" of Quantum Mechanics, all scenarios remain equally possible. But that is in DIFFERENT multiple parallel realities of existence. But, we are stuck with one current bare reality in the Holly Bobo case and one new fact: her remains were found NORTH from her abduction site. As far as we know to-date, nothing relevant was found SOUTH of her home.
On a more practical note; only the Three Stooges would have traveled south on Swan Johnson Road after the abduction. They would most certainly have been observed and their license plates recorded by multiple police-vehicle occupants traveling to the scene.
And concerning a more immediate subject, remember in Spring of 2013 (it is in my timeline on Websleuths) when a private investigative agency claimed they deduced the path of Holly Bobo's abductor(s) after her kidnapping (from her cell phone pings)? Their map showed a route that passes eerily close to where Holly's remains were recently found. Is this blind luck? This private investigative group could not have possessed better information than the authorities (otherwise Holly's remains would have been found much earlier). What do you make of this serendipitous prediction by the private investigators?
By the way, I have seen several posts that imply Holly was not found because of the logical fallacy of a "needle in a haystack" argument. The searchers use CADAVER DOGS. If Holly's remains were at the present discovery site three years ago AND if this area was searched at that time, the dogs would have located her almost immediately. Yogi the bloodhound (check this dog out at
http://www.alie.org/about.html- this story is better than any dramatic movie) would have traced Holly from her abduction site to her final resting place with his ears tied behind his back! If Yogi the bloodhound had been employed on the day of Holly's abduction, we would have nothing to talk about now.
Sleuth On!
