Bootsctr
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2012
- Messages
- 8,428
- Reaction score
- 295
Right. It was said they asked to go for a bike ride at 11:30. So maybe they did go down by Mr. C's house and he saw them around 12. Then they headed back and were on the cctv at 12:11-12:19 and THEN something happened. I keep going back to either it is not the girls on the cctv or TG did not see the girls bikes. It seems close to impossible for both to be true.
We have tried taking TG out of the timeline - but what if we take the cctv sighting out of the timeline? LE may have put that out there because they know it is NOT the girls on the video and they want someone to come forward. I can't get over the dark colored shirts on the video.
Maybe the girls headed out at 11:30 - ended up down by Mr. C's around noon - headed back home, dropped their bikes in the driveway, and then a couple teens took off on the bikes and ended up at the lake trail where TG saw the bikes but no girls. Those teens would be the ones who had a minor or unintended part in this - and who LE wants to come forward. I cannot explain where the girls are with this scenario because they made it home - but maybe someone known to them pulled up in a car and said it's time to go - hop in.
ETA: It doesn't have to be teens, it could be anyone. The bike Lyric was riding was a mountain bike. So maybe it was an adult and a teen or child. Maybe it was an adult and a 14 or 16 year old kid. Maybe it was a small adult man who looks like a punk kid.
I wanted to add I agree with Mr. C too and that he was probably pretty sure because he watered the lawn regularly and I bet about the same time every day. He was sure, but then the wife interjected her opinion. I have learned over many years of marriage that when I tend to correct my husband it is I that is often wrong. I believe Mr. C was correct in saying 12:00 to 1:00 as around the time he saw the girls, probably closer to 12:00.