B4igo2it
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2009
- Messages
- 7,069
- Reaction score
- 1,905
BBM: I know EXACTLY what you mean! :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh::blushing:
:noooo::censored::tmi:
BBM: I know EXACTLY what you mean! :floorlaugh: :floorlaugh::blushing:
I didn't realize Readlyn was only 7 minutes from Seven Bridges park. I shudder to think if the kidnapping CMF was accused of had been successful if the victim would also have been taken to Sevenbridges as well. lease:
I'm a dog trainer so please excuse me if the following seems insensitive; it isn't meant that way.
Puppies are born with immunity from the diseases their mothers are immune to (which includes immunity from vaccination). Until that maternal immunity wears off, vaccination shots don't work because their little bodies already have those immune cells. At some point the maternal immunity fades and then their bodies take over the job of producing immune cells. Unfortunately, there is a window period where maternal immunity is too low to offer reliable protection from disease but too high to trigger their bodies to produce immune cells. This window period lasts about a week and can happen anywhere between 6 and 24 weeks of age.
Research shows that the developmental period during which puppies easily accept novelty is between birth and 12-14 weeks old. Most anything that a puppy has a positive reaction to during this period of time will be accepted throughout the puppy's life as normal. Early socialisation is important for bite control, among other things (fear is by far the most common reason dogs bite).
So, look at those timelines. There's definitely a chance of a gap there, when the puppy needs socialisation experiences but may not be immune to diseases.
There was a time when vets strongly recommended that puppies not be exposed to the world at large until 16 weeks old, due to the fear of disease. But that also means that the puppy is not being exposed to life at large and runs the risk of not being able to accept normal things easily.
So what's a good dog owner to do? Wrap their puppy up in cotton wool and HEPA filtres, do lots of titre testing and not expose the puppy to the world until they are certain the puppy has good immunity? Or expose the puppy to the world, accepting the risk of disease?
Making that decision involves mentally balancing the risk factors. Is being safe from disease more important than learning about the world? Is being less likely to bite a human being more important than protecting the puppy from potential diseases?
There is no single correct answer, it all depends on the individual owner and puppy.
So how does all this apply to raising children? It seems to me that there is a direct correlation. It's natural to want to keep children totally, completely, as close to 100% safe as possible... except that is not always in the child's own best interests. Unlike dogs, children do grow up and eventually have to face the world on their own. So a wise parent realises that they have to release the death grip on their child at some point before the child hits 18 and can legally say "you can't stop me, nyah nyah nyah!" Or the child hits 18, 19, 20, 25, etc, and refuses to leave the parental home out of fear of the outside world.
I've seen what can happen to a kid whose life is too strictly controlled and bound by a parent. My best friend didn't even wait until he was 18 to say "I'm going and you can't stop me!" Then he spent 15 years doing the most dangerous stuff he could find in order to somehow prove to his mother that she couldn't stop him. I'm so grateful one of his early steps was to join the Army, which gave him a sort of safe environment to be a reckless daredevil (door gunner, sniper, etc).
Frankly, if he were my kid, his life would give me heart attacks. He scares me sometimes even now but the only thing I cannot say to him is "please don't do that because it is too risky." All I can say is "can I hold your beer for you?" Yeah, we're rednecks.
Each parent has to decide where the right balance between freedom and the attendant risks vs safety and the attendant risks lies. And no parent makes the perfect decision every single day.
Usually, the mistakes are not fatal but sometimes they are.
The orange crime scene flag puzzles me. I have been chewing on the idea of its meaning since 5 and now wonder if it means nothing at all. I read some msm report that referred to these markers been placed about the scene but we only see a pic of this one?
I think it was inadvertently dropped upon exitting and clearing the scene. If LE had just left them all behind I would expect the site to be littered with them.
:slaphead:
Sometimes I over obsess.
I hate to say this and with all due respect, it sounds like you've already tried and convicted this guy for the cousins' abduction and murders and he's not been named a POI yet that we know of. I didn't think we were allowed to make remarks or accusations like this on WS since LE has not named a POI or suspect yet. Don't get me wrong, you've done a great job finding things about this guy, but from a legal stand point I would think we'd have to be careful not to actually accuse him.
Let's hope it doesn't take this long to find and convict who did this
http://news.msn.com/us/washington-man-gets-life-for-1957-slaying-of-ill-girl
I've kept quiet about this guy because
1. he's not my guy, it's not that type of crime to me;
2. LE have gone through all local RSO's with a fine tooth comb. It's not him.
:cow:
I actually understand the desire of Heather and Drew to hold a celebration of LIFE for Lizzie only. She will forever be linked with Lyric in death. They will always be known as "the cousins who went missing" or the "cousins who were murdered"....etc...Maybe just this one last time, she wants to pay tribute to her daughter, as an individual. And I think she is right to do it. No matter how special Lyric was to Heather...Lizzie was her daughter.
BBM
Hi, kseal07, welcome back.
No, it definitely has not been said that the girls were chained to trees. That's just been some of our speculation in an effort to figure out why the trees were cut down.
At this time, all we know is that Lyric and Lizzie are dead, and their bodies were found at Seven Bridges Wildlife Area. Anything beyond that is just typical WS speculation in lieu of any info from LE.
We did have some delightful wild pig conversations yesterday, so be sure not to miss those.
Glad you're back with us, I remember your posts from earlier on.
Oh my gosh gngr snap you're right. I had forgotten that until you mentioned it. These are older articles but per this one: http://www.examiner.com/article/police-search-for-two-missing-black-hawk-county-children "Drew and Heather work at Johnson's Bakery & Planetary Tree Service"
And this one: http://wcfcourier.com/news/evansdal...cle_94b14cc4-cf32-11e1-9131-001a4bcf887a.html
"The Collins own Planetary Tree Service in Evansdale. M****** S******, who also owns a local tree service with her husband, volunteered to hand out food and drinks on Sunday." (name asterisked out by me)
Yes... there's an association with tree cutting services. Related? Who knows, but good memory.
BBM
I don't know about tree cutting, but Drew Collins owns a tree trimming business. However, I can't believe for one minute that he was involved in this. JMO.
I've kept quiet about this guy because
1. he's not my guy, it's not that type of crime to me;
2. LE have gone through all local RSO's with a fine tooth comb. It's not him.
:cow:
BBM
Hi, kseal07, welcome back.
No, it definitely has not been said that the girls were chained to trees. That's just been some of our speculation in an effort to figure out why the trees were cut down.
At this time, all we know is that Lyric and Lizzie are dead, and their bodies were found at Seven Bridges Wildlife Area. Anything beyond that is just typical WS speculation in lieu of any info from LE.
We did have some delightful wild pig conversations yesterday, so be sure not to miss those.
Glad you're back with us, I remember your posts from earlier on.
Oh my gosh gngr snap you're right. I had forgotten that until you mentioned it. These are older articles but per this one: http://www.examiner.com/article/police-search-for-two-missing-black-hawk-county-children "Drew and Heather work at Johnson's Bakery & Planetary Tree Service"
And this one: http://wcfcourier.com/news/evansdal...cle_94b14cc4-cf32-11e1-9131-001a4bcf887a.html
"The Collins own Planetary Tree Service in Evansdale. M****** S******, who also owns a local tree service with her husband, volunteered to hand out food and drinks on Sunday." (name asterisked out by me)
Yes... there's an association with tree cutting services. Related? Who knows, but good memory.
BBM
I don't know about tree cutting, but Drew Collins owns a tree trimming business. However, I can't believe for one minute that he was involved in this. JMO.
I am amazed at the close to the vest, no leaks and no info yet.
Usually we get tidbits to work with.
JMOO, LE knows or has a good idea on COD & TOD and when the bodies were dumped by now.
So they have reasons for keeping things so quiet.
They are not asking for publics help at all.
Any ideas???
http://www.powermachinery.com/products/rough-terrain-piggyback-lifts.htm
View attachment 28486
I know that lumber yards use this and they call it a "pig" ironic ???
Wonder if tree cutting services use them too?
N
moo
BBM you've got to be kidding me...
I totally agree with you on your take on this guy! My niece is a criminal attorney here in my state and believe it or not her husband is from Waterloo originally and she told me we have to be very careful not to actually come out and accuse anyone. I'm not trying to be snarky in anyway and I hope people realize that.
RSO Rules[/B]: It seems there is a legal consideration concerning whether we are allowed to bring information to Websleuths from the actual sex offender registry. [/B]
It is illegal to use the sex offender register information to harass anyone. We would never condone this at Websleuths. It is not illegal (in my opinion) if when a child goes missing or is harmed we look at the sex offenders in the area and post their information, along with maps to show how close they live to the victim. In every case we have local people reading and posting here. Therefore we are within the guidelines using this info for local information. Again, we are not EVER going to even hint at harassing anyone on the sex offenders list. Any posting we do about a sex offender will always be within the law. If any of you have other questions about what you can and can't post please contact a mod and we will do our best to clear things up.
O/T but interesting IMO:
Since a canine nose is equipped with some 200 million more olfactory receptors than a human's, scientists are increasingly turning to dogs as field assistants to track and monitor populations of wild species.
Such "conservation dogs" can sniff out creatures as small as a lizard or as large as a gorilla, pinpoint where invasive plants are growing, and even guide marine biologists to fresh whale poop. (See pictures of scat research.) But can a dog smell the past?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...haeology-dogs-australia-conservation-canines/