I've wondered the same... and yet, IIRC, we've seen estimates here in the past which imply it can take weeks to make a DNA determination... gads I hope not...
Jumping off Cinder's post:
On the subj of (#1) if they have perp DNA at 7bridges and (#2) if the said perp turns out to be the pigman... then why the h*ll didn't the pigman pop-up on DNA database search?!?
On that subj, here's my question: Is it possible that the perp DNA at 7bridges was so degraded by time and/or in such a small amt that the best the techs could do is employ that "multiply results thingy" which they use?
Is it possible that the "multiply results thingy" wasn't strong enough to trigger a match in DNA database???
O/T and ETA: I'm too tired to finish my thoughts... come on peeps, please somebody understand where I was headed, which has to to with "now that they have a strong DNA profile" for comparison...
My guess is there is no 'perp' dna involved/found at 7-Bridges or anywhere else. Partial or otherwise. Nada.
Any news report no matter how 'beyond reproach' that mentions dna int his case is irresponsible speculation if not based on something official that has come from an official source.
I 'nailed' one tv reporter for engaging in such 'speculation' and she did not
take it well. She refused to issue a retraction under the claim: "we know
more than you do"!