As for the FBI stating they thought the girls were alive, I never believed it. That's pretty much standard operating BS; the reason LE agencies use it is that the public remains more engaged when there is a chance that the victims are alive than when it is believed the victims are dead. Unless there is a good reason articulated for believing the victim(s) are alive, well... the victim(s) are probably dead. It wasn't like there was any indication that Lyric and Elizabeth had run away, for instance.
The early stages investigation was evaluated by a national agency, the name of which I cannot recall right now darnit, found to be overall quite good and having made no major mistakes. Small town Iowa does not necessarily equate to incompetent.
I agree with you about Misty. I think she's gotten the short end of the stick all around and that she's yet another victim of our insane war on drugs (what will it take for us to realise it is a losing war that is sucking billions of dollars out of our economy every year in terms of LE, human potential, etc?). In the first two weeks the girls were gone, there were a lot of car searches. After that, it started to become a question of civil rights and rightfully so. If you're innocent, just how many searches do you have to put up with simply because you happen to live near a missing child? After the first five, I think it would become very old very quick.
What I find most hopeful was the news that they still have an investigator working the case full time. That says to me that the case has not yet gone cold, that they are still getting leads worth chasing down. And maybe they are going back through the early leads to re-evaluate them; that's my hope, anyway, because I think that's where the most likely clues are.
Although as time goes on, I wonder more and more about a travelling predator like Joseph Duncan III. While the use of 7 Bridges seems to indicate local knowledge, Duncan committed plenty of crimes on a travelling through basis and had no apparent problems in finding places that were remote and little used. I wonder if anyone has checked on other remote areas in Blackhawk and Bremer counties to see if anyone remembers seeing any vehicles in them in the month before the girls were abducted?
Just jumping off your post regarding the comments of "we have reason to believe the girls are still alive" comments by the FBI:
IMHO I think (at that point) their strongest (and possibly their only) "lead" was the fact that Dan and Misty both had questionable pasts that were heavily entwined in the drug world. Not to mention Dan's court hearing and all the hoopla around him backing out on testifying immediately prior to them disappearing, etc.
If they had ANY reason to suspect the girls could have been taken (or even a fake attempt of staging a "kidnapping" to create a diversion) I think they would play out a plea to the public in an attempt to get someone to speak up.
I know this may not be the majority opinion here, but I feel that although they followed the protocol of what to do in the case of a missing child, I didn't get the feeling (initially anyway) LE thought it was just a random kidnapping.
I really felt at the beginning that while they were trying to keep everything close to the vest, their real focus was a narrow scope. From the taking of Dan and Misty's cell phone, to the beating down of the hotel door in the middle of the night - flat out accusing Dan of knowing what happened to the girls, to the subpoena of Misty's interview with KWWL, to the requests of multiple lie detector tests, to the tightening up of Dan's supervision, to the flat out lying to the public that "all RSO's have been cleared" within 48 hrs (later finding out they were still interviewing them a week later), to denying knowledge of witnesses (TG), to the ambush of the house a block from where Wylma lived, etc...the list goes on.
Do I think they were keeping open the "possibility" that a random perp had taken the girls? Absolutely. And publicly they were doing all the "right" things that LE should do in the case of a missing child. But do I think that they really thought they were going to find the girls stuffed in the trunk of someone's vehicle at a checkpoint? Not for one second.
In my opinion, I think they had their faces sniffing down the "obvious" rabbit hole - and truly, honestly felt that is where the strongest lead was - that the girls were not really "missing" but rather "conveniently missing". I have ZERO facts to back this up, this is just what MY impression was early on.
I feel that over time that focus shifted...after months of waiting and searching through all of these thousands of "leads" they reportedly receive. The focus then shifted to the white SUV, the paddleboat rider, the location of Seven Bridges, etc...slowly shifting the focus to a much broader scope.
Drew has made it clear via his interviews that he feels this is a sex offender, period. Heather? Not so much. She maintains her belief that it was, indeed, tied somehow to drugs and Misty and Dan's connection to that world.
But I think straight out the shoot...the most obvious, the most likely, the BEST possible outcome, would have been that it WAS tied to drugs (aka Dan and Misty) and their disappearance was no more than an attempt to maintain freedom (per Dan's words of "I'm not ready to go to jail").
And that is why I personally think they commented that they had reason to believe the girls were still alive. I know others may not agree...that is just how I felt at the beginning. I think differently now, but at the time of that comment I really felt they thought they were getting close to finding out this was all a big sham and the girls weren't in danger.