Nothing that's been released gives me any thought that he held her. Sounds like he grabbed her and soon afterwards killed her.
Unless there is new that differs from what's been reported so far, I don't think he held her.
jmopinion
Not my call to decide what's reportable - use your judgement and then the mod decides.Sorry, didn't realize that was reportable.
According to CR's attorney, Facts are just points of view. What is wrong with the world today?
Attorney for Mollie Tibbetts' suspected killer Cristhian Rivera fights back
I don't believe the prelim autopsy report lists date of death.Guys. From the very top points in the linked article:
Iowa student Mollie Tibbetts died of 'multiple sharp force injuries' | Daily Mail Online
- Bureau's Evidence Response Team swooped minutes after an autopsy revealed Mollie Tibbetts was killed by 'multiple sharp force injuries' on July 18
They had a K-9 unit. I think they are looking for the crime scene. Mollie may have been held for several days before she was murdered.
Iowa student Mollie Tibbetts died of 'multiple sharp force injuries' | Daily Mail Online
Yup. They don’t care what While I guess thats not impossible I don't see anything in the evidence at this point to disprove a rage killing. Even if she wasn't dead when put in the trunk I think she was at least not conscious from being put in the the trunk. However until they give a time frame of how long they think the body has been deceased I guess its still possible she could have been held, but I feel she was no longer coherent when put in the trunk.
Oh, ok. Thanks for the clarification.LEO in PC this week said CR admitted to having seen MT running before, and he did stalk her that evening, is on video driving back and forth along her running route - that's how they caught him. It wasn't a random crime of opportunity.
And without anyone seeing or hearing a thing? I thought other people lived there as well. And the property owners, not to mention the girlfriend? I cant see it.It’s possible that she was held for a period of time, but I strongly disagree with that theory, here’s why:
Although he’s obviously decided not to reveal specific details (in a face saving effort), his story, in a general sense, rings true.
He attacks Mollie during her run, and is able to neutralize her (with a fist, a knife, or some other means).
He has to get her to an isolated location in order to sexually assault her (confirmation of rape notwithstanding). So he puts her in the trunk and drives to a secluded spot.
He carries Mollie a short distance, into the corn, where the rest of the attack occurs. He covers the body before leaving, and if he has not already, removes her phone and Fitbit, for destruction.
This type of event happens quite a bit. Joggers are frequently attacked along running routes, and dragged off the trail, into a wooded area, where they are raped and murdered. In this case, the perpetrator had his vehicle to worry about (easily visible), which necessitated him removing it and the victim from the area.
For him to take an injured Mollie to his residence (or any secondary location) is less likely than the scenario that he claims to have occurred. JMO
Maybe couldn't get a search warrant until it was declared a homocide and they could specify what type of weapon they were looking for.
In my opinion, I think if she was sexually assaulted then this was definitely a planned out attack and would have included stalking her- he could have seen her before and been sexually attracted to her.
If she was NOT sexually assaulted then I think he likely randomly saw her, flirted, got angry when she rejected him and killed her out of anger. This would be more of an opportunistic attack.
Either way, I am praying she wasn’t sexually assaulted.
And without anyone seeing or hearing a thing? I thought other people lived there as well. And the property owners, not to mention the girlfriend? I cant see it.
I'm 100% convinced SA was the motive, the stalking was telling of that, and the murder of Mollie a terrible end result of him silencing her because of it and trying to cover his tracks. But he got caught thankfully by video footage at a nearby property he wasn't aware of out on back roads he stalked her on of him driving back and forth and back and forth past her running, and coming up behind her in his car.I rewatched it. That was definitely what the judge said. I immediately assumed there must be some evidence or suspicion she was SA
There is enough for a warrant. And I’m about 99% certain the far owners would have gladly given permission to search.
From Flesh to Bone: The Role of Weather in Body Decomposition | The Weather ChannelSomeone made the point awhile back that due to the climate that may not be the case. I wouldn't mind a scientific explanation for that, if anyone knows. I know it may be graphic but I would like to know the reason why, if it's true.
Thanks, I asked that before but have had 2 different responses.He had not been living with the girlfriend for a while.