I agree. But I just can't imagine that this guy would be so dumb. As I mentioned, I had students who were 15, 16 years old who are from the same culture, ( most who have not even been here as long as Rivera, and they know NOT to use a phone if they are engaging in various criminal activities. I guess that's why I can't understand that he woulnt know That! It's just not believable to me. Of course, this would also point to him NOT planning the crime, and that it was spur of the moment. I have said previously that I think he was planning an assault, or at least thinking about doing it. Since investigators asked him if he had ever seen her jogging there before, it makes me think that may be what they are thinking. So who knows? It doesn't make sense. I guess it could be that although he may have been planning it, it all happened so fast and in the heat of the moment did not think of the phone until after he had done the deed. I think I'll go with that.
BBM
Dumb?
Psychology students?
Who knows how to ditch a cell phone when committing a criminal activity? Isn't that what Rivera did? The digital signal led from Mollie's abduction to 10 miles SE of Brooklyn. The digital signal did not lead from the body location site to Rivera's house. It looks like he had enough tech knowledge to leave his digital trail near the body, but not hear his house.
We don't know that investigators asked if he had every seen her jogging, but it is part of his story that he had seen her jogging prior to abducting her on the night that she was jogging.
Did he put her in the trunk when he abducted her, or did he pull in front of her, open the side door, push her in, pull a u-turn, and take off?