Or they didn't want to miss anything. I would err on getting too much stuff, rather than missing something important. This case is big, who would want to be holding the bag if they messed up, and BK got off on some arcane technicality?
I think this case will go to trial: it is so early in discovery that we have no idea what the prosecution has beyond that which was delineated in the Affidavit-- It also depends how strong the prosecution case is and we do not know if their case is weak or strong at this point. BK strikes me as a person who wants his day in court--- even if the prosecution case turns out to be strong, I believe he thinks he can impress a jury.
The very long and detailed search warrant document includes detail of application for warrant where LE request and explain why they need to search for all the electronic data, physical evidnence etc etc. The media outlets that you infer have taken this amazingly detailed document that explains process and justification for the warrant and somehow read it as proof of some actual evidence that has already been found, instead of an explanation of what any potential seized items from the house, ie shoes, computers etc might produce in terms of evidence after testing and analysis, after specialist assistance and so forth. The items in return of service list have been seized and analysis of them (including electronics and receipts and hairs and bits of pillow) is underway. That's all we know. MOO
It was just Item C on the list
IMO, i dont believe he was being surveilled. So his attempt to conceal his trash, by placing it in the neighbors, would not have occurred if he had known. So I believe he thought he was not going to be connected to that trash.
No, no shoes. Return of Service document. MOO. My link is too big to link again. It's on numerous of my posts in last hour or so or someone may just have a link to the Return of Service DOc.
How close are the houses? I don't buy his can was full so he went to the neighbors can. I'm sure they had more then 1 can and even if full, most people just rest the bag next to it until the next pick-up. It's just odd to me. JMO
Definitely, it just seems to me like they didn't take all that much evidence. Like it just mentions 2 receipts and a tag, not a whole bunch of receipts and papers and tags. This is all just my amateur impression though, I have no idea about evidence collection.
www.washingtonexaminer.com
I still think it is a private investigator, maybe with ties to someone in LE.
BBM, AFAIK, no info about the victims and data compilations related to the victims has been released to the public. I'm assuming specialist and investigators are analysing what was seized under the search warrant at this time. The official document in question simply explains what LE was looking for under the search warrant and why. MOO
That's a god idea, One a guy who thought he was so smart may have tried to throw the cops off what kind of knife he used.
Plus the concept you leave clothes undisturbed in an apartment complex laundry facility for 2 months doesn't compute. At all. JMO
This case is a good example of why eyewitnesses are not the best evidence for either side. The testimony of the roommate witness will show BK fits her description But she is going to be brutally cross-examined.
Great sleuthing!
This…it’s like he’s smart enough to leave minimal (virtually none) DNA at the scene but too stupid to discard DNA of evidentiary value in a trash bin that’s not across the street from his parents’ home?!?
