Zella
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2018
- Messages
- 2,188
- Reaction score
- 17,512
I would hesitate to say this was a strategic release of information. This was their most solid evidence at the time when they asked for the warrant for his arrest because they're trying to convince a judge. They're not going to leave out better evidence that would help convince him to give them what they're asking for. Indeed, as the PCA shows, they held back important details from the media prior to writing the PCA, so they had this surprise twist of there actually being a witness who saw the killer that night. I doubt they had more compelling information at the time they were concealing from a judge.I've been pretty much assuming they included enough conclusive information to make the Judge comfortable they have the right guy, but I wouldn't expect them to put their best stuff in it. It's a strategic release of information, right?
Yes, BK and his attorney were eventually going to read it, but that's not the primary audience. The primary audience is that judge who can sign off or not.
That being said, you are correct it is not an indication of everything they have. It's also not current. We have no idea what additional evidence has been uncovered in the past month since this warrant was issued once they were able to arrest BK, search his home and property, and delve more into his digital life.
TLDR: This was likely the best evidence they had at the time, but it is not all of the evidence they had and doesn't account for newer findings.
Ultimately, it's just a piece of the puzzle, but since little else official has been released, people don't really have a lot of talk about, so the PCA is going to be nitpicked to death, over and over again.
MOO