It is approx. 20 days after the crime, IMO it's not unusual for him to healed already.It's going to be hard for the prosecutor. He has no scratches on his face which would be normal during a fight.
It is approx. 20 days after the crime, IMO it's not unusual for him to healed already.It's going to be hard for the prosecutor. He has no scratches on his face which would be normal during a fight.
I'm going to maintain that it was a car match within a few days and a DNA match within the last week.We need to figure out when exactly they identified him.
Clearer pic
From previous thread.That’s actually a good question about Codis. I’d like to know myself tbh. I do remember being swabbed a long time ago before I even knew what dna was so I assume there is some type of database that’s accessible and searchable. We didn’t have a choice or were allowed to ask questions about it so I just kept my mouth shut and only opened it to let them swab me, lol.
It's the turnpike (toll road). Instead of having to stop to pay the attendant, if you have the Easy Pass apparatus on your car, you just zip through, while the transponders (or whatever they're called) make note of when you went through, and the cost. You pay for it through an online account that you deposit $$ into.What is it please? EasyPass, I mean?
This is the quote and no scratches were mentioned,That sounds plausible (most theories are, one is that he's a vegan and won't touch meat infected stuff), but I was looking for the link because it was stated by one that a class mate has told, that BK didn't shave to cover scratches.
Story is 2 years old and unrelated to this case.BBMFF
Ut oh, if this is true, I hope this does not become a problem during trial. Anyone in the legal field care to chirp in here?
That’s why I never understood how Letecia Stauch was able to relocate and dump poor Gannon. Surveillance failure.I’m sure they had his vehicle fully covered (GPS Tracker), and knew he would attempt to maintain an air of “normalcy” (as he did) during the road trip. Local LE and the Feds do this often, when pursuing such alleged felons for capture, arrest, and conviction purposes. Oh, and little need for plane when drones silently, efficiently, and at a fraction of the cost/trouble can do the work of an entire fleet of aircraft. JMOO
Hi and welcome.New here so hopefully I do this right!
Curious if anyone here is familiar with what to expect in terms of when
BK's legal team will be appointed once he's back in Idaho? I believe I saw earlier in one of these threads that if this is capital case, BK would be appointed two lawyers, but is anyone familiar with the timeline here?
Very sorry if this has been asked and answered! Doing my best to keep up with the thread.
Not true. Some states obtain DNA when they arrest individuals for certain crimes, e.g., felonies.
It has video embedded within that basically shows Brian Entin (a news reporter) discussing the hows and whys of how the killer entered and exited the house as well as routes.The article is not available to us in Europe, so could you give a couple sentences on what's in it and/or why you find it interesting? Thanks.
I think quite late too and after the departure on Dec11.
People have been saying that they knew immediately and had him under full surveillance while in Washington , like for weeks but LE never said that, did they? They only said 4 days in Penn.
It wouldn't have made any sense to let him drive away had they identified him well in advance of the trip, would it?
Possibly the 4 day track in Penn was about the murder weapon in case he planned on hiding it there.
That was a helluva twinkle tho'
Yeah, not at all. Much more Dennis Reynolds (It's Always Sunny), who is always hinted at being a serial killer.not even a little close lol
Thanks, @10ofRods!! Super interesting.The light used in taking a photograph makes a big difference in whether healed or healing bruises or scratches can be seen.
Mug shots are not usually taken by a forensic photographer. They are usually taken under flat white light (and quite a bit of light).
Here's a book on how lighting techniques affect the ability of forensic examiners to see scratches, bruises or other less visible injuries:
Forensic Photography
Forensic photography plays a vitally important part in the investigation of crime and the subsequent administration of justice. Written by a practitioner with many years professional experience, this book provides an overview of the most common forensic photography techniques in use today for...www.google.com
P. 226 gives a very interesting example of a healing wound that was virtually invisible. First image is reference (ordinary) lighting. The others are done by a forensic photographer which, I will bet a whole box of donuts, is what they did with BCK, probably or possibly before his mug shot.
And they will likely do the photography again in Idaho. Notice how the technique called "reflective UV" gives good results of wound shape even months later, when to ordinary photography the wound looks healed. Reflective UV is used in anthropological digs and to study marks on old bones as well (as long as some even more sensitive techniques that can only be used on the deceased). At any rate, we have a reflective UV light at my public college's anthro lab (no criminology program; not that many people going into forensics; not all that expensive).
So, my suggestion is to NOT use mug shots as your forensic evidence as a websleuth. Keep in mind that there are forensic investigators with techniques that can reveal convincingly to a jury that the defendant had past wounds.
As for wound healing times, I'll try and put something together soon. I got a good scratch 12 hours ago, and I'm way older than BCK, but I bet my ordinary light photos will not show it in 10 days. Maybe less.