Sister Golden Hair
Former Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2022
- Messages
- 1,395
- Reaction score
- 8,980
jmo imo... if you read my later posts, I explain my thinking. I can see how hunting could be of interest to a killer in training, regardless of where the organs are located. There are other things that would align. I don't think it's just about anatomy. It also requires a certain detachment, willingness to kill a sentient being, etc. jmo imo.I am a great lover of animals, but I also know (and love) many hunters. Someone would injure my dogs or horses over my dead body, but I have shot at (and missed) a coyote that was using my chickens as a dinner buffet and bit one of my dogs. I'm also alot more comfortable with hunters who eat what they kill than I am those who hunt for trophies - even though both are legal. I suppose I am a study in contrasts.
One thing I found fascinating and unexpected about the FBI bulletin is that only 16% of offenders seem to start by hurting animals. That it's apparently more common for someone to start by hurting humans and then hurting animals later. I was also appalled to learn how many abusive spouses injure companion animals, and how often their children see it.
We have all read about serial killers who mistreated animals, but I've never read that it was thought to be practice for killing a person. And, as someone said earlier, animal anatomy just isn't at all comparable to human anatomy. I certainly haven't done an exhaustive study, but I don't recall reading any serial killer profiles that stated the person was an avid hunter and that hunting preceded their graduation to human prey. So, I have doubts about the link between hunting and situations like this.
JMO
edited to add: I think it also matters how one defines 'hunting'. IMO JMO the people who read this and immediately jump to defend hunters are likely thinking of the person who hunts for food or enjoyment. I'm not saying that every person who does that might become a killer of humans.
My definition of hunting is not just as a sport, but includes killing animals for fun or practice. I'm not talking about the person who goes and shoots some ducks over a weekend (I could never, but I know some enjoy it). Skills sometimes related to hunting like (sorry, about to get gross here) disembowelment, skinning, bleeding out, decapitation, butchering, etc., could be of interest to a wanna-be killer and they might indulge with animals to get the feel of it. (Of course, not all hunters do those bloodier things themselves, but some do.) IMO it is reasonable to think that this killer might have practiced hunting animals before hunting humans, in the same way that someone who wants to cook meth probably learns some basic skills first. imo jmo.
Last edited: